Re: [PATCH v12 1/5] can: m_can: Create a m_can platform framework
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: 2019-07-25 07:10:03
Also in:
linux-can, lkml
On 7/25/19 8:28 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:36:02AM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:quoted
Hello On 7/24/19 1:47 AM, Greg KH wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:14:14AM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:quoted
Hello On 7/10/19 7:08 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:quoted
Hello On 6/17/19 10:09 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:quoted
Marc On 6/10/19 11:35 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:quoted
Bump On 6/6/19 8:16 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:quoted
Marc Bump On 5/31/19 6:51 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:quoted
Marc On 5/15/19 3:54 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:quoted
Marc On 5/9/19 11:11 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:quoted
Create a m_can platform framework that peripheral devices can register to and use common code and register sets. The peripheral devices may provide read/write and configuration support of the IP. Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <redacted> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <redacted> --- v12 - Update the m_can_read/write functions to create a backtrace if the callback pointer is NULL. - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1052302/Is this able to be merged now?pingWondering if there is anything else we need to do? The part has officially shipped and we had hoped to have driver support in Linux as part of the announcement.Is this being sent in a PR for 5.3? DanAdding Greg to this thread as I have no idea what is going on with this.Why me? What am I supposed to do here? I see no patches at all to do anything with :(I am not sure who to email. The maintainer seems to be on hiatus or super busy with other work.Who is the maintainer?
That's me.
quoted
So I added you to see if you know how to handle this. Wolfgang Acked it but he said Marc needs to pullThen work with them, again, what can I do if I can't even see the patches here?
The patches are included in a pull request to David Miller (net-next/master, the CAN upstream), which has already have been merged.
quoted
it in. We have quite a few users of this patchset. I have been hosting the patchset in a different tree. These users keep pinging us for upstream status and all we can do is point them to the LKML to show we are continuing to pursue inclusion. https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=393454Looks sane, work with the proper developers, good luck!
Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 488 bytes