Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] macsec: add brackets and indentation after calling macsec_decrypt

From
Andreas Steinmetz <hidden>
Date
2019-07-02 04:38:29
Reply to
Sabrina Dubroca, 2019-07-01
Ouch, I missed that when Andreas sent me that patch before. No, it is
actually intended. If we skip macsec_decrypt(), we should still
account for that packet in the InPktsUnchecked/InPktsDelayed
counters. That's in Figure 10-5 in the standard.

Thanks for catching this, Willem. That patch should only move the
IS_ERR(skb) case under the block where macsec_decrypt() is called, but
not move the call to macsec_post_decrypt().
Updated patch below.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Steinmetz <redacted>
--- a/drivers/net/macsec.c	2019-07-02 06:31:27.550120145 +0200
+++ b/drivers/net/macsec.c	2019-07-02 06:33:38.637599529 +0200
@@ -1205,17 +1205,18 @@
 
 	/* Disabled && !changed text => skip validation */
 	if (hdr->tci_an & MACSEC_TCI_C ||
-	    secy->validate_frames != MACSEC_VALIDATE_DISABLED)
+	    secy->validate_frames != MACSEC_VALIDATE_DISABLED) {
 		skb = macsec_decrypt(skb, dev, rx_sa, sci, secy);
 
-	if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
-		/* the decrypt callback needs the reference */
-		if (PTR_ERR(skb) != -EINPROGRESS) {
-			macsec_rxsa_put(rx_sa);
-			macsec_rxsc_put(rx_sc);
+		if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
+			/* the decrypt callback needs the reference */
+			if (PTR_ERR(skb) != -EINPROGRESS) {
+				macsec_rxsa_put(rx_sa);
+				macsec_rxsc_put(rx_sc);
+			}
+			rcu_read_unlock();
+			return RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED;
 		}
-		rcu_read_unlock();
-		return RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED;
 	}
 
 	if (!macsec_post_decrypt(skb, secy, pn))
Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, last reply 2019-07-02
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help