Thread (6 messages) flat view 6 messages, 3 authors, 2019-06-06

Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: fix unconnected udp hooks

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: 2019-06-06 00:19:52
Also in: bpf

On 06/06/2019 02:13 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 5:09 PM Daniel Borkmann [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
 tools/bpf/bpftool/cgroup.c     |  5 ++++-
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |  2 ++
Should the bpf.h sync to tools/ be in a separate patch?
I was thinking about it, but concluded for such small change, it's not
really worth it. If there's a strong opinion, I could do it, but I think
that 2-liner sync patch just adds noise.
it's not about the size. It breaks the sync of libbpf.
we should really enforce user vs kernel to be separate patches.
Okay, I see. Fair enough, I'll split them in that case.

Thanks,
Daniel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help