On 06/06/2019 02:13 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 5:09 PM Daniel Borkmann [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
tools/bpf/bpftool/cgroup.c | 5 ++++-
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 ++
Should the bpf.h sync to tools/ be in a separate patch?
I was thinking about it, but concluded for such small change, it's not
really worth it. If there's a strong opinion, I could do it, but I think
that 2-liner sync patch just adds noise.
it's not about the size. It breaks the sync of libbpf.
we should really enforce user vs kernel to be separate patches.
Okay, I see. Fair enough, I'll split them in that case.
Thanks,
Daniel