Re: [PATCH] sctp: Add rcu lock to protect dst entry in sctp_transport_route
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Date: 2019-06-13 15:20:43
Also in:
linux-sctp, lkml
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 07:35:44AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:37:51AM +0800, Su Yanjun wrote:quoted
在 2019/6/12 21:13, Neil Horman 写道:quoted
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:33:17AM +0800, Su Yanjun wrote:quoted
在 2019/6/10 19:12, Neil Horman 写道:quoted
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:20:00AM +0800, Su Yanjun wrote:quoted
syzbot found a crash in rt_cache_valid. Problem is that when more threads release dst in sctp_transport_route, the route cache can be freed. As follows, p1: sctp_transport_route dst_release get_dst p2: sctp_transport_route dst_release get_dst ... If enough threads calling dst_release will cause dst->refcnt==0 then rcu softirq will reclaim the dst entry,get_dst then use the freed memory. This patch adds rcu lock to protect the dst_entry here. Fixes: 6e91b578bf3f("sctp: re-use sctp_transport_pmtu insctp_transport_route")quoted
Signed-off-by: Su Yanjun <redacted> Reported-by: syzbot+a9e23ea2aa21044c2798@syzkaller.appspotmail.com --- net/sctp/transport.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)diff --git a/net/sctp/transport.c b/net/sctp/transport.c index ad158d3..5ad7e20 100644 --- a/net/sctp/transport.c +++ b/net/sctp/transport.c@@ -308,8 +308,13 @@ void sctp_transport_route(struct sctp_transport*transport,quoted
struct sctp_association *asoc = transport->asoc; struct sctp_af *af = transport->af_specific; + /* When dst entry is being released, route cache may be referred + * again. Add rcu lock here to protect dst entry. + */ + rcu_read_lock(); sctp_transport_dst_release(transport); af->get_dst(transport, saddr, &transport->fl, sctp_opt2sk(opt)); + rcu_read_unlock();What is the exact error that syzbot reported? This doesn't seem like it fixesBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in rt_cache_valid+0x158/0x190 net/ipv4/route.c:1556 Read of size 2 at addr ffff8880654f3ac7 by task syz-executor.0/26603 CPU: 0 PID: 26603 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.2.0-rc2+ #9 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113 print_address_description.cold+0x7c/0x20d mm/kasan/report.c:188 __kasan_report.cold+0x1b/0x40 mm/kasan/report.c:317 kasan_report+0x12/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:614 __asan_report_load2_noabort+0x14/0x20 mm/kasan/generic_report.c:130 rt_cache_valid+0x158/0x190 net/ipv4/route.c:1556 __mkroute_output net/ipv4/route.c:2332 [inline] ip_route_output_key_hash_rcu+0x819/0x2d50 net/ipv4/route.c:2564 ip_route_output_key_hash+0x1ef/0x360 net/ipv4/route.c:2393 __ip_route_output_key include/net/route.h:125 [inline] ip_route_output_flow+0x28/0xc0 net/ipv4/route.c:2651 ip_route_output_key include/net/route.h:135 [inline] sctp_v4_get_dst+0x467/0x1260 net/sctp/protocol.c:435 sctp_transport_route+0x12d/0x360 net/sctp/transport.c:297 sctp_assoc_add_peer+0x53e/0xfc0 net/sctp/associola.c:663 sctp_process_param net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:2531 [inline] sctp_process_init+0x2491/0x2b10 net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:2344 sctp_cmd_process_init net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:667 [inline] sctp_cmd_interpreter net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1369 [inline] sctp_side_effects net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1179 [inline] sctp_do_sm+0x3a30/0x50e0 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1150 sctp_assoc_bh_rcv+0x343/0x660 net/sctp/associola.c:1059 sctp_inq_push+0x1e4/0x280 net/sctp/inqueue.c:80 sctp_backlog_rcv+0x196/0xbe0 net/sctp/input.c:339 sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:945 [inline] __release_sock+0x129/0x390 net/core/sock.c:2412 release_sock+0x59/0x1c0 net/core/sock.c:2928 sctp_wait_for_connect+0x316/0x540 net/sctp/socket.c:9039 __sctp_connect+0xab2/0xcd0 net/sctp/socket.c:1226 __sctp_setsockopt_connectx+0x133/0x1a0 net/sctp/socket.c:1334 sctp_setsockopt_connectx_old net/sctp/socket.c:1350 [inline] sctp_setsockopt net/sctp/socket.c:4644 [inline] sctp_setsockopt+0x22c0/0x6d10 net/sctp/socket.c:4608 compat_sock_common_setsockopt+0x106/0x140 net/core/sock.c:3137 __compat_sys_setsockopt+0x185/0x380 net/compat.c:383 __do_compat_sys_setsockopt net/compat.c:396 [inline] __se_compat_sys_setsockopt net/compat.c:393 [inline] __ia32_compat_sys_setsockopt+0xbd/0x150 net/compat.c:393 do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:337 [inline] do_fast_syscall_32+0x27b/0xd7d arch/x86/entry/common.c:408 entry_SYSENTER_compat+0x70/0x7f arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S:139 RIP: 0023:0xf7ff5849 Code: 85 d2 74 02 89 0a 5b 5d c3 8b 04 24 c3 8b 14 24 c3 8b 3c 24 c3 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 51 52 55 89 e5 0f 34 cd 80 <5d> 5a 59 c3 90 90 90 90 eb 0d 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 RSP: 002b:00000000f5df10cc EFLAGS: 00000296 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000016e RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000007 RCX: 0000000000000084 RDX: 000000000000006b RSI: 000000002055bfe4 RDI: 000000000000001c RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 Allocated by task 480: save_stack+0x23/0x90 mm/kasan/common.c:71 set_track mm/kasan/common.c:79 [inline] __kasan_kmalloc mm/kasan/common.c:489 [inline] __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0xcf/0xe0 mm/kasan/common.c:462 kasan_slab_alloc+0xf/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:497 slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:437 [inline] slab_alloc mm/slab.c:3326 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc+0x11a/0x6f0 mm/slab.c:3488 dst_alloc+0x10e/0x200 net/core/dst.c:93 rt_dst_alloc+0x83/0x3f0 net/ipv4/route.c:1624 __mkroute_output net/ipv4/route.c:2337 [inline] ip_route_output_key_hash_rcu+0x8f3/0x2d50 net/ipv4/route.c:2564 ip_route_output_key_hash+0x1ef/0x360 net/ipv4/route.c:2393 __ip_route_output_key include/net/route.h:125 [inline] ip_route_output_flow+0x28/0xc0 net/ipv4/route.c:2651 ip_route_output_key include/net/route.h:135 [inline] sctp_v4_get_dst+0x467/0x1260 net/sctp/protocol.c:435 sctp_transport_route+0x12d/0x360 net/sctp/transport.c:297 sctp_assoc_add_peer+0x53e/0xfc0 net/sctp/associola.c:663 sctp_process_param net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:2531 [inline] sctp_process_init+0x2491/0x2b10 net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:2344 sctp_sf_do_unexpected_init net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c:1541 [inline] sctp_sf_do_unexpected_init.isra.0+0x7cd/0x1350net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c:1441 sctp_sf_do_5_2_1_siminit+0x35/0x40 net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c:1670 sctp_do_sm+0x121/0x50e0 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1147 sctp_assoc_bh_rcv+0x343/0x660 net/sctp/associola.c:1059 sctp_inq_push+0x1e4/0x280 net/sctp/inqueue.c:80 sctp_backlog_rcv+0x196/0xbe0 net/sctp/input.c:339 sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:945 [inline] __release_sock+0x129/0x390 net/core/sock.c:2412 release_sock+0x59/0x1c0 net/core/sock.c:2928 sctp_wait_for_connect+0x316/0x540 net/sctp/socket.c:9039 __sctp_connect+0xab2/0xcd0 net/sctp/socket.c:1226 sctp_connect net/sctp/socket.c:4846 [inline] sctp_inet_connect+0x29c/0x340 net/sctp/socket.c:4862 __sys_connect+0x264/0x330 net/socket.c:1834 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:1845 [inline] __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:1842 [inline] __ia32_sys_connect+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:1842 do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:337 [inline] do_fast_syscall_32+0x27b/0xd7d arch/x86/entry/common.c:408 entry_SYSENTER_compat+0x70/0x7f arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S:139 Freed by task 9: save_stack+0x23/0x90 mm/kasan/common.c:71 set_track mm/kasan/common.c:79 [inline] __kasan_slab_free+0x102/0x150 mm/kasan/common.c:451 kasan_slab_free+0xe/0x10 mm/kasan/common.c:459 __cache_free mm/slab.c:3432 [inline] kmem_cache_free+0x86/0x260 mm/slab.c:3698 dst_destroy+0x29e/0x3c0 net/core/dst.c:129 dst_destroy_rcu+0x16/0x19 net/core/dst.c:142 __rcu_reclaim kernel/rcu/rcu.h:222 [inline] rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2092 [inline] invoke_rcu_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:2310 [inline] rcu_core+0xba5/0x1500 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2291 __do_softirq+0x25c/0x94c kernel/softirq.c:293 The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8880654f3a00 which belongs to the cache ip_dst_cache of size 176 The buggy address is located 23 bytes to the right of 176-byte region [ffff8880654f3a00, ffff8880654f3ab0) The buggy address belongs to the page: page:ffffea0001953cc0 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff8880a76ad600 index:0xffff8880654f3c00 flags: 0x1fffc0000000200(slab) raw: 01fffc0000000200 ffffea00026be808 ffffea000181c088 ffff8880a76ad600 raw: ffff8880654f3c00 ffff8880654f3000 0000000100000002 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected Memory state around the buggy address: ffff8880654f3980: fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc ffff8880654f3a00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00quoted
ffff8880654f3a80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc^ ffff8880654f3b00: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ffff8880654f3b80: fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc ==================================================================quoted
anything. Based on what you've said above, we have multiple processes looking up and releasing routes in parallel (which IIRC should never happen, as only one process should traverse the sctp state machine for a given association at any one time).Looks like multiple process could run into sctp_transport_route.Yeah, I'm sorry, my previous comment was a bit overstated, you can definately have multiple process going through the state machine, but not with the same packet. That said, this fix still isn't right. Looking at the code, It appears that we are manipulating a route inside __mkroute_output that is in the process of being destroyed. But the destruction occurs from an rcu_callback, and the lookup process in __mkroute_output is under the protection of the rcu_read_lock already (as seen in ip_route_output_key_hash), so the destruction should be delayed until that _mkroute_output call is complete, and the call in __mkroute_output should skip any route that is in-flight to be destroyed, because the reference count should be zero (causing dst_hold_safe to return 0).Yes, you are right. __mkroute_output is impossible to cause dst entry to be released.quoted
Basically, it seems like somehow, __mkroute_output has found a route, and started to dereference parts of it, while it is at the same time being freed,But dst entry may be released somewhere.Yes, thats how dst entries get released.quoted
As syzbot reports, HEAD commit: 9221dced Merge tag 'for-linus-20190601' of git://git.kerne.. git tree: upstream console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=114cdc0ea00000 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=1fa7e451a5cac069 dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a9e23ea2aa21044c2798 compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental) userspace arch: i386 i searched dst_release in sctp code, sctp_transport_dst_release is a big suspicion. If multiple processes calling sctp_transport_dst_release would cause refcnt==0, dst entry will be reclaimed.Yes, that too is clear, but dst_release drops the refcount, and if its zero, calls call_rcu(..., dst_destroy_rcu), which only finally frees the dst entry after an rcu grace period. __mkroute_output is always called under the protection of rcu_read_lock (see ip_route_output_key_hash), so any call to dst_release will have the actual free until some time after rcu_read_unlock is called, meaning any access made to the corresponding dst entry in __mkroute_output is safe. And if__mkroute_output selects a dst entry that is pending deletion from an already registered rcu callback will get skipped, because its refcount is zero, and dst_hold_safe will return zero (since it uses atomic_inc_not_zero to increment the refcount).quoted
__mkroute_output in route.c: prth = raw_cpu_ptr(nh->nh_pcpu_rth_output); rth = rcu_dereference(*prth); it uses *nh_pcpu_rth_output* to refer the route cache. If dst entry has been released, no one sets *nh_pcpu_rth_output* to null, only rt_cache_route updates it with a new one. anywhere release_dst and get_dst which may access the same dst concurrently should be under rcu lock protection.Yes, and it is, via ip_route_output_key_hash, and that appears in both call traces, so we should be under rcu lock protection.quoted
I'm not familar with sctp. but looks like a problem dst_release related.Generally speaking, yes, this appears to be an issue in which the rcu callback for dst_release is getting called while we are inside __mkroute_output with the dst still findable via the ip_route_output_key path.
One other point is that this particular dst entry doesn't "belong" to a transport or even the sctp subsystem. Dst entries are shared throughout the system. Marcelo
No idea yet, how thats happening though. Neilquoted
quoted
which should never happen. How we are getting into that situation though, I have no idea yet. Neilquoted
quoted
Protecting the lookup/release operations with a read side rcu lock won't fix that. Neilquoted
if (saddr) memcpy(&transport->saddr, saddr, sizeof(union sctp_addr)); -- 2.7.4