On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 09:31 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 12:04 +1000, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
quoted
From: Alastair D'Silva <redacted>
Apologies for the large CC list, it's a heads up for those
responsible
for subsystems where a prototype change in generic code causes a
change
in those subsystems.
This series enhances hexdump.
Still not a fan of these patches.
I'm afraid there's not too much action I can take on that, I'm happy to
address specific issues though.
quoted
These improve the readability of the dumped data in certain
situations
(eg. wide terminals are available, many lines of empty bytes exist,
etc).
Changing hexdump's last argument from bool to int is odd.
Think of it as replacing a single boolean with many booleans.
Perhaps a new function should be added instead of changing
the existing hexdump.
There's only a handful of consumers, I don't think there is a value-add
in creating more wrappers vs updating the existing callers.
--
Alastair D'Silva mob: 0423 762 819
skype: alastair_dsilva
Twitter: @EvilDeece
blog: http://alastair.d-silva.org