On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 09:57:05PM +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote:

On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 07:45 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 06:51:45PM +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote:

quoted

On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 20:15 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:

quoted

From: Leon Romanovsky <redacted>

Changelog:
 v0 -> v1:

Normally 1st submission is V1 and 2nd is V2.
so this should have been v1->v2.

"Normally" depends on the language you are using. In C, everything
starts from 0, including version of patches :).

You are wrong:
quoting: https://kernelnewbies.org/PatchTipsAndTricks

"For example, if you're sending the second revision of a patch, you
should use [PATCH v2]."

now don't tell me that second revision is actually 3rd revision or 1st
is 2nd :)..

:)

If you don't mind, I will stick to common sense (v0, v1, v2 ...)
and official kernel documentation, which mentions existence of v1.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L682

quoted

quoted

For mlx5-next patches:

Acked-by: Saeed Mahameed <redacted>

Thanks