Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2019-05-28
STALE2668d

[PATCH bpf-next] bpf: check signal validity in nmi for bpf_send_signal() helper

From: Yonghong Song <hidden>
Date: 2019-05-25 18:57:59
Also in: bpf
Subsystem: bpf [general] (safe dynamic programs and tools), bpf [security & lsm] (security audit and enforcement using bpf), bpf [tracing], the rest, tracing · Maintainers: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, KP Singh, Matt Bobrowski, Song Liu, Linus Torvalds, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu

Commit 8b401f9ed244 ("bpf: implement bpf_send_signal() helper")
introduced bpf_send_signal() helper. If the context is nmi,
the sending signal work needs to be deferred to irq_work.
If the signal is invalid, the error will appear in irq_work
and it won't be propagated to user.

This patch did an early check in the helper itself to
notify user invalid signal, as suggested by Daniel.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <redacted>
---
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 70029eafc71f..fe73926a07cd 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -600,6 +600,12 @@ BPF_CALL_1(bpf_send_signal, u32, sig)
 		return -EPERM;
 
 	if (in_nmi()) {
+		/* Do an early check on signal validity. Otherwise,
+		 * the error is lost in deferred irq_work.
+		 */
+		if (unlikely(!valid_signal(sig)))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
 		work = this_cpu_ptr(&send_signal_work);
 		if (work->irq_work.flags & IRQ_WORK_BUSY)
 			return -EBUSY;
-- 
2.17.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help