Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/16] xsk: Add getsockopt XDP_OPTIONS
From: Maxim Mikityanskiy <hidden>
Date: 2019-05-06 13:45:49
Also in:
bpf
On 2019-05-04 20:25, Björn Töpel wrote:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 20:12, Maxim Mikityanskiy [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Make it possible for the application to determine whether the AF_XDP socket is running in zero-copy mode. To achieve this, add a new getsockopt option XDP_OPTIONS that returns flags. The only flag supported for now is the zero-copy mode indicator. Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <redacted> Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <redacted> Acked-by: Saeed Mahameed <redacted> --- include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h | 7 +++++++ net/xdp/xsk.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h | 7 +++++++ 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+)diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h index caed8b1614ff..9ae4b4e08b68 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct xdp_mmap_offsets { #define XDP_UMEM_FILL_RING 5 #define XDP_UMEM_COMPLETION_RING 6 #define XDP_STATISTICS 7 +#define XDP_OPTIONS 8 struct xdp_umem_reg { __u64 addr; /* Start of packet data area */@@ -60,6 +61,12 @@ struct xdp_statistics { __u64 tx_invalid_descs; /* Dropped due to invalid descriptor */ }; +struct xdp_options { + __u32 flags; +}; + +#define XDP_OPTIONS_FLAG_ZEROCOPY (1 << 0)Nit: The other flags doesn't use "FLAG" in its name, but that doesn't really matter.quoted
+ /* Pgoff for mmaping the rings */ #define XDP_PGOFF_RX_RING 0 #define XDP_PGOFF_TX_RING 0x80000000diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c index b68a380f50b3..998199109d5c 100644 --- a/net/xdp/xsk.c +++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c@@ -650,6 +650,28 @@ static int xsk_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, return 0; } + case XDP_OPTIONS: + { + struct xdp_options opts; + + if (len < sizeof(opts)) + return -EINVAL; + + opts.flags = 0;Maybe get rid of this, in favor of "opts = {}" if the structure grows?
I'm OK with any of these options. Should I respin the series, or can I follow up with the change in RCs if the series gets to 5.2? Alexei, is it even possible to still make changes to this series? The window appears closed.
quoted
+ + mutex_lock(&xs->mutex); + if (xs->zc) + opts.flags |= XDP_OPTIONS_FLAG_ZEROCOPY; + mutex_unlock(&xs->mutex); + + len = sizeof(opts); + if (copy_to_user(optval, &opts, len)) + return -EFAULT; + if (put_user(len, optlen)) + return -EFAULT; + + return 0; + } default: break; }diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h index caed8b1614ff..9ae4b4e08b68 100644 --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct xdp_mmap_offsets { #define XDP_UMEM_FILL_RING 5 #define XDP_UMEM_COMPLETION_RING 6 #define XDP_STATISTICS 7 +#define XDP_OPTIONS 8 struct xdp_umem_reg { __u64 addr; /* Start of packet data area */@@ -60,6 +61,12 @@ struct xdp_statistics { __u64 tx_invalid_descs; /* Dropped due to invalid descriptor */ }; +struct xdp_options { + __u32 flags; +}; + +#define XDP_OPTIONS_FLAG_ZEROCOPY (1 << 0) + /* Pgoff for mmaping the rings */ #define XDP_PGOFF_RX_RING 0 #define XDP_PGOFF_TX_RING 0x80000000 --2.19.1