On 03/01/2019 12:24 AM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:

Recently we had linux-next bpf/bpf-next conflict when we added new
functionality to the test_progs.c at the same location. Let's split
test_progs.c the same way we recently split test_verifier.c.

I follow the same patten we did in commit 2dfb40121ee8 ("selftests: bpf:
prepare for break up of verifier tests") for verifier: create
scaffolding to support dedicated files and slowly move the tests into
separate files.

The first patch adds scaffolding, subsequent patches move progs into
separate files.

In theory, many of the standalone tests can be migrated to this new
framework as well. They get the benefit of common CHECK macro and
bpf_find_map function which a lot of standalone tests need to redefine.

v2 changes:
* added cover letter, added more description about file structure

Stanislav Fomichev (7):
  selftests: bpf: break up test_progs - preparations
  selftests: bpf: break up test_progs - pkt access
  selftests: bpf: break up test_progs - xdp
  selftests: bpf: break up test_progs - stackmap
  selftests: bpf: break up test_progs - tracepoint
  selftests: bpf: break up test_progs - spinlock
  selftests: bpf: break up test_progs - misc

Looks good, thanks for bringing some structure into selftests! Series
failed to apply cleanly on the last patch though:

Switched to a new branch 'bpf-split-prog-tests'
Applying: selftests: bpf: break up test_progs - preparations
Applying: selftests: bpf: break up test_progs - pkt access
Applying: selftests: bpf: break up test_progs - xdp
Applying: selftests: bpf: break up test_progs - stackmap
Applying: selftests: bpf: break up test_progs - tracepoint
Applying: selftests: bpf: break up test_progs - spinlock
Applying: selftests: bpf: break up test_progs - misc
fatal: sha1 information is lacking or useless (tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c).
error: could not build fake ancestor

Last commit in that file before this series is your ebace0e981b2
("selftests/bpf: use __bpf_constant_htons in test_prog.c for flow
dissector"), please respin with a fresh rebase.

Thanks,
Daniel