Re: [PATCH net-next v4 05/22] ethtool: introduce ethtool netlink interface
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2019-03-21 15:25:19
Also in:
lkml
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2019-03-21 15:25:19
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 03:13:43PM +0100, Michal Kubecek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 02:57:05PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:quoted
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 02:07:35PM +0100, Michal Kubecek wrote:quoted
+static int __init ethnl_init(void) +{ + int ret; + + ret = genl_register_family(ðtool_genl_family); + if (ret < 0) + panic("ethtool: could not register genetlink family\n");Panic seems a bit strong. Do we really want to kill the box because this fails?When I switched CONFIG_ETHTOOL_NETLINK from tristate to bool, I checked some other non-modular subsystems to see what they do on failed initialization and each of them did handle it by panic() so I didn't think about it too much and did the same. Thinking about it now, if the family registration fails, the only entry point to care about should be ethtool_notify() (I'll have to check more carefully to be sure) so that adding a check there should be sufficient to let everything work (except for the netlink interface, of course).
Hi Michal So maybe do a WARN_ON() and return the error code. Linus has been quite vocal about killing the box when there is no real need... Andrew