Thread (53 messages) read the whole thread 53 messages, 7 authors, 2019-03-12

Re: [PATCH 3/8] aio: store event at final iocb_put()

From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: 2019-03-11 22:52:51
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:13:28PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 08:44:31PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 07:08:17AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
quoted
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Instead of having aio_complete() set ->ki_res.{res,res2}, do that
explicitly in its callers, drop the reference (as aio_complete()
used to do) and delay the rest until the final iocb_put().

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
 fs/aio.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
index 2249a7a1d6b3..b9c4c1894020 100644
--- a/fs/aio.c
+++ b/fs/aio.c
@@ -1077,24 +1077,10 @@ static inline void iocb_destroy(struct aio_kiocb *iocb)
 	kmem_cache_free(kiocb_cachep, iocb);
 }
 
-static inline void iocb_put(struct aio_kiocb *iocb)
-{
-	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&iocb->ki_refcnt))
-		iocb_destroy(iocb);
-}
Maybe iocb_put should just have been added in the place you move
it to in patch 1?
Might as well...
Actually, that wouldn't be any better - it would need at least a declaration
before aio_complete(), since in the original patch aio_complete() calls it.
So that wouldn't be less noisy...
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help