Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 5 authors, 2019-03-30

Re: New xdpsock sample

From: Jonathan Lemon <hidden>
Date: 2019-03-26 16:12:01

The rationale (IIRC) was that it would be easier for new users to
get started using AF_XDP by providing everything that was needed
by default.

Passing in XSK_LIBBPF_FLAGS__INHIBIT_PROG to the library will
bypass loading the sample program, so a user application may still
use the library with their own bpf program.

I'll admit that the change likely makes it harder to simply modify
the sample program for other uses, but that's not really the point
of the samples.
-- 
Jonathan

On 26 Mar 2019, at 8:46, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
Hi Magnus and all,

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1045921/

This series removes xdpsock_kern.c and replaces it by the bytecode
hardcoded in libbpf. I am wondering whether there is some real issue
with having the XDP program in a separate C file, just like before,
because this change made it far less convenient to modify the XDP
program. Could you give any comments?

Thanks,
Max
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help