Hello Jon.

On 27.02.19 21:18, Jonathan Corbet wrote:

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 20:59:12 +0100
Stefan Schmidt [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

The patches are based on net-next, but they only touch the networking book so I
would not expect and trouble. From what I have seen they would go through
Jonathan's tree after being acked by Dave? If you want this patches against a
different tree let me know.

Usually Dave takes networking documentation patches directly, so that is
what I would expect here.

OK, so I got that wrong. Works for me. Dave, you want to take them
directly, if nothing else comes up during review, or should I apply them
to my tree and send them with the next pull request?

I took a quick look anyway; seems generally good.  The main comment I
would make is that much of what's there would be better placed as
kerneldoc comments in the code itself that can then be pulled into the
formatted docs.  But that can be a job for another day...

Interesting point. That might be indeed a good idea on some parts of
this sparse doc. Need to check how this is handled in other docs. It
also needs extending scope and context, but again something for a follow
up patchset.

regards
Stefan Schmidt