Re: [PATCH v1 iproute2-next 1/4] rdma: add helper rd_sendrecv_msg()
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Date: 2019-02-26 19:17:09
Also in:
linux-rdma
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:19:12AM -0600, Steve Wise wrote:
On 2/23/2019 3:31 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:quoted
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 11:26:15AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:quoted
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 08:19:03AM -0800, Steve Wise wrote:quoted
This function sends the constructed netlink message and then receives the response, displaying any error text. Change 'rdma dev set' to use it. Signed-off-by: Steve Wise <redacted> --- rdma/dev.c | 2 +- rdma/rdma.h | 1 + rdma/utils.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/rdma/dev.c b/rdma/dev.c index 60ff4b31e320..d2949c378f08 100644 --- a/rdma/dev.c +++ b/rdma/dev.c@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static int dev_set_name(struct rd *rd) mnl_attr_put_u32(rd->nlh, RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_DEV_INDEX, rd->dev_idx); mnl_attr_put_strz(rd->nlh, RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_DEV_NAME, rd_argv(rd)); - return rd_send_msg(rd); + return rd_sendrecv_msg(rd, seq); } static int dev_one_set(struct rd *rd)diff --git a/rdma/rdma.h b/rdma/rdma.h index 547bb5749a39..20be2f12c4f8 100644 --- a/rdma/rdma.h +++ b/rdma/rdma.h@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ bool rd_check_is_key_exist(struct rd *rd, const char *key); */ int rd_send_msg(struct rd *rd); int rd_recv_msg(struct rd *rd, mnl_cb_t callback, void *data, uint32_t seq); +int rd_sendrecv_msg(struct rd *rd, unsigned int seq); void rd_prepare_msg(struct rd *rd, uint32_t cmd, uint32_t *seq, uint16_t flags); int rd_dev_init_cb(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void *data); int rd_attr_cb(const struct nlattr *attr, void *data);diff --git a/rdma/utils.c b/rdma/utils.c index 069d44fece10..a6f2826c9605 100644 --- a/rdma/utils.c +++ b/rdma/utils.c@@ -664,6 +664,27 @@ int rd_recv_msg(struct rd *rd, mnl_cb_t callback, void *data, unsigned int seq) return ret; } +static int null_cb(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void *data) +{ + return MNL_CB_OK; +} + +int rd_sendrecv_msg(struct rd *rd, unsigned int seq) +{ + int ret; + + ret = rd_send_msg(rd); + if (ret) { + perror(NULL);This is more or less already done in rd_send_msg() and that function prints something in case of execution error. So the missing piece is to update rd_recv_msg(), so all places will "magically" print errors and not only dev_set_name().quoted
+ goto out; + } + ret = rd_recv_msg(rd, null_cb, rd, seq);Will this "null_cb" work for all send/recv flows or only in flows where response can be error only?Only those flows where no nl attributes are expected to be returned.quoted
Will we need this recv_msg if we implement extack support?I'm not sure how extack works. Do you know?
I can't say that :)
Thanks! Steve.
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 801 bytes