Re: [PATCH v11 perf, bpf-next 7/9] perf tools: synthesize PERF_RECORD_* for loaded BPF programs
From: Song Liu <hidden>
Date: 2019-01-22 18:45:15
Also in:
lkml
On Jan 22, 2019, at 7:21 AM, Jiri Olsa [off-list ref] wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:58:05PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:quoted
Em Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 03:51:19PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:quoted
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:31:17PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:quoted
Em Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:13:20PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:quoted
Em Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:46:55AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:quoted
Em Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 08:15:19AM -0800, Song Liu escreveu:quoted
This patch synthesize PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL and PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT for BPF programs loaded before perf-record. This is achieved by gathering information about all BPF programs via sys_bpf.DittoThis is breaking 'perf sched', see below, the fix seems trivial: [root@quaco ~]# perf sched record -a sleep 2 [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] 0x5b60 [0x138]: failed to process type: 17 [ perf record: Captured and wrote 1.539 MB perf.data ] [root@quaco ~]# perf sched lat 0x5b60 [0x138]: failed to process type: 17 Failed to process events, error -22 [root@quaco ~]#So: perf_session__process_event (event->header.type = 17 (PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL) if (tool->ordered_events) ret = perf_evlist__parse_sample_timestamp(evlist, event, ×tamp); if (ret && ret != -1) return ret; So it returns here with -EFAULT, i.e. this is failing: int perf_evlist__parse_sample_timestamp(struct perf_evlist *evlist, union perf_event *event, u64 *timestamp) { struct perf_evsel *evsel = perf_evlist__event2evsel(evlist, event); if (!evsel) return -EFAULT; return perf_evsel__parse_sample_timestamp(evsel, event, timestamp); } It isn't mapping the event ID it finds back to an evsel.. Jiri, ideas? This is happening so far only for 'perf sched', perf record with two events works.I saw also perf mem failing because of this.. will checkRight, seems something with the synthesizing of existing bpf progs, which always there are some nowadays, for instance, on this fedora29 system: [root@quaco tmp]# bpftool prog 13: cgroup_skb tag 7be49e3934a125ba gpl loaded_at 2019-01-21T13:30:27-0200 uid 0 xlated 296B jited 229B memlock 4096B map_ids 13,14 14: cgroup_skb tag 2a142ef67aaad174 gpl loaded_at 2019-01-21T13:30:27-0200 uid 0 xlated 296B jited 229B memlock 4096B map_ids 13,14 15: cgroup_skb tag 7be49e3934a125ba gpl loaded_at 2019-01-21T13:30:27-0200 uid 0 xlated 296B jited 229B memlock 4096B map_ids 15,16 16: cgroup_skb tag 2a142ef67aaad174 gpl loaded_at 2019-01-21T13:30:27-0200 uid 0 xlated 296B jited 229B memlock 4096B map_ids 15,16 17: cgroup_skb tag 7be49e3934a125ba gpl loaded_at 2019-01-21T13:30:29-0200 uid 0 xlated 296B jited 229B memlock 4096B map_ids 17,18 18: cgroup_skb tag 2a142ef67aaad174 gpl loaded_at 2019-01-21T13:30:29-0200 uid 0 xlated 296B jited 229B memlock 4096B map_ids 17,18 21: cgroup_skb tag 7be49e3934a125ba gpl loaded_at 2019-01-21T13:30:29-0200 uid 0 xlated 296B jited 229B memlock 4096B map_ids 21,22 22: cgroup_skb tag 2a142ef67aaad174 gpl loaded_at 2019-01-21T13:30:29-0200 uid 0 xlated 296B jited 229B memlock 4096B map_ids 21,22 [root@quaco tmp]# When with a bunch of tracepoints, that is what 'perf mem', 'perf kmem', 'perf sched', etc does, it ends up failing here: ret = perf_evlist__parse_sample_timestamp(evlist, event, ×tamp); So it is not passed to ret = perf_session__queue_event(session, event, timestamp, file_offset); in perf_session__process_event, this happens right when processing buildids in 'perf record', and also in 'perf report', so that is something badly synthesized that hits perf.data for PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL.it's reproducible with simple: perf record -e cycles,instructions ls as you said on irc, it's the machine->id_hdr_size size missing there's one more glitch, attached patch fixes that for me you can't use sizeof(struct ksymbol_event), because it includes the name as well.. which screws the size but I don't know that code that much.. might be still something missing jirka
Hi Arnaldo and Jiri,
Thanks for catching and fixing the bug.
I guess the following is OK?
*bpf_event = (struct bpf_event){
.header = {
.type = PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT,
.size = sizeof(struct bpf_event),
},
.type = PERF_BPF_EVENT_PROG_LOAD,
.flags = 0,
.id = info.id,
};
as struct bpf_event doesn't have variable length name:
struct bpf_event {
struct perf_event_header header;
u16 type;
u16 flags;
u32 id;
/* for bpf_prog types */
u8 tag[BPF_TAG_SIZE]; // prog tag
};
Or we need similar fix?
Song