Re: [RFC PATCH V3 0/5] Hi:
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2019-01-07 03:29:00
Also in:
kvm, lkml
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2019-01-07 03:29:00
Also in:
kvm, lkml
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 10:19:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2019/1/3 上午4:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:quoted
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 08:46:51PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
This series tries to access virtqueue metadata through kernel virtual address instead of copy_user() friends since they had too much overheads like checks, spec barriers or even hardware feature toggling.Will review, thanks! One questions that comes to mind is whether it's all about bypassing stac/clac. Could you please include a performance comparison with nosmap?On machine without SMAP (Sandy Bridge): Before: 4.8Mpps After: 5.2Mpps
OK so would you say it's really unsafe versus safe accesses? Or would you say it's just a better written code?
On machine with SMAP (Broadwell): Before: 5.0Mpps After: 6.1Mpps No smap: 7.5Mpps Thanks
no smap being before or after? -- MST