On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 at 07:10, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 01:31:43 +0900
quoted
+void exit_umh(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ struct umh_info *info;
+ pid_t pid = tsk->pid;
+
+ mutex_lock(&umh_list_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(info, &umh_list, list) {
Thank you for review!
So this is probably too expensive of a cost for every process exit.
The problem is that the cost will be taken even if the process is
not a UMH.
Yes, I agree with you.
I've taken my time to respond in hopes that I could come up with a
good alternative to suggest, but so far I don't have any better ideas.
I'll keep thinking about this some more, please let me know if you
have any ideas.
Thanks a lot for spending time to think about better ideas!
How about adding a new PF_UMH flag for task_struct->flags to identify
UMH process?
By using this flag, the exit_umh() can avoid unnecessary lookups.
Thanks again.