Re: [PATCH RFC lora-next 1/4] net: lora: sx125x sx1301: correct style warnings
From: Ben Whitten <hidden>
Date: 2019-01-05 07:36:42
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
Hi Andreas, On 29/12/2018 09:05, Andreas Färber wrote:
Hi Ben, Am 19.12.18 um 16:56 schrieb Ben Whitten:quoted
Checkpatch highlights some style issues which need to be addressed. Signed-off-by: Ben Whitten <redacted> --- drivers/net/lora/sx125x.c | 20 +++++++++------ drivers/net/lora/sx1301.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- drivers/net/lora/sx1301.h | 7 +++--- 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)Thanks for splitting this off from the functional changes. This will need some more explanations and discussion. In particular the comment changes look wrong to me. Also please don't butcher code just because checkpatch.pl may warn about line length at this early stage.
Yeh they seemed odd but checkpatch doesn't like a /* on a line by its self it seems.
A good catch in there was the unsigned casts, which are no longer necessary since the regmap conversion, so we should just squash that into the earlier commits. Note that I used to run checkpatch.pl as git commit hook: http://blog.vmsplice.net/2011/03/how-to-automatically-run-checkpatchpl.html But since some git update that started to break git rebase -i in case of false positives (with rebase stopping and on trying to continue commits unintentionally getting squashed), so I deactivated it again and don't manually check each commit I stage anymore, in favor of slowly completing implementations to a working point.
Good to know, I'll avoid running it for the time and drop this from the v2 Thanks! Ben Whitten _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel