Re: [PATCH net-next v2 01/11] devlink: Add health buffer support
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Date: 2019-01-20 10:12:40
Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:59:10PM CET, eranbe@mellanox.com wrote: [...]
+static void +devlink_health_buffers_destroy(struct devlink_health_buffer **buffers_list, + u64 size);
Avoid fwd declarations.
+
+static struct devlink_health_buffer **
+devlink_health_buffers_create(u64 size)
+{
+ struct devlink_health_buffer **buffers_list;
+ u64 num_of_buffers = DEVLINK_HEALTH_SIZE_TO_BUFFERS(size);
+ u64 i;
+
+ buffers_list = kcalloc(num_of_buffers,
+ sizeof(struct devlink_health_buffer *),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!buffers_list)
+ return NULL;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_of_buffers; i++) {
+ struct devlink_health_buffer *buffer;
+ void *data;
+
+ buffer = kzalloc(sizeof(*buffer), GFP_KERNEL);
+ data = kzalloc(DEVLINK_HEALTH_BUFFER_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!buffer || !data) {
+ kfree(buffer);
+ kfree(data);
+ goto buffers_cleanup;
+ }
+ buffers_list[i] = buffer;
+ buffer->data = data;
+ }
+ devlink_health_buffers_reset(buffers_list, num_of_buffers);
+
+ return buffers_list;
+
+buffers_cleanup:
+ devlink_health_buffers_destroy(buffers_list, --i);Just do for-kfree here.
+ kfree(buffers_list);
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void
+devlink_health_buffers_destroy(struct devlink_health_buffer **buffers_list,
+ u64 num_of_buffers)
+{
+ u64 i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_of_buffers; i++) {
+ kfree(buffers_list[i]->data);
+ kfree(buffers_list[i]);
+ }
+}
+[...]