Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/9] tools: bpftool: add basic probe capability, probe syscall availability

On 01/17/2019 11:02 AM, Quentin Monnet wrote:

2019-01-16 16:28 UTC-0800 ~ Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref]

quoted

On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:21:11 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:

quoted

+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+tool for inspection of eBPF-related parameters for Linux kernel or net device
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Slight preference for s/eBPF/BPF/, the system call and /proc/ stuff is
all called bpf, not ebpf.

Also a question/nit here:

Does the rst2man tool care about the marking vs text length, here
dashes are longer than the actual text, people are fixing such
occurrences for Sphinx, I wonder if we should care?

I'd rather keep it unchanged in this patch, as it is aligned with what other bpftool man pages do: bpftool, bpftool-cgroup, bpftool-map and bpftool-prog all have “eBPF” (bpftool-perf and bpftool-net have “bpf”, lower case) in their description. And all pages have longer dash rules, which rst2man does not seem to mind about.

I can fix all this for all bpftool pages in a follow-up patch, though, if it's alright for you?

My preference is on for s/eBPF/BPF/ as well, so lets fix everything up;
follow-up is okay with me.

Thanks,
Daniel