Thread (9 messages) flat view 9 messages, 3 authors, 2018-12-12

Re: [PATCH v2] ptp: fix an IS_ERR() vs NULL check

From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Date: 2018-12-06 12:38:48
Also in: kernel-janitors, lkml

Greg,

On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 06:10:49PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 06:55:38AM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:00:33AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
quoted
Why did you commit 3b1ad360acad ("pps: using ERR_PTR instead of NULL
while pps_register_source fails")?  You're not listed as a maintainer so
I wouldn't have known to CC you.
I'm confused.  Where is that commit?
...
I'm on linux-next but originally it came from the char-misc-next tree.

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git char-misc-next
Commit 3b1ad360acad changes a return value in the PPS core, but it is
missing the hunk for the caller in drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c.  Can that
be amended?

Thanks,
Richard
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help