Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 15 authors, 2018-12-07

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: 2018-12-01 09:41:39
Also in: dri-devel, linux-doc, linux-fsdevel, linux-ide, linux-media, linux-mips, linux-pm, linux-scsi, lkml, nouveau

On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 14:26 -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 03:14:59PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
[...]
quoted
Have you read Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-
interpretation.rst? 
As has been pointed out, it contains a clear answer to how things
should be interpreted here.
Ugh, was not aware that there two documents.

Yeah, definitely sheds light. Why the documents could not be merged
to single common sense code of conduct?
The fact that we've arrived at essentially an original CoC
reinterpreted to the point where it's effectively a new CoC has been
the source of much debate and recrimination over the last few months
... you can read it in the ksummit-discuss archives, but I really think
we don't want to reopen that can of worms.

James


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help