Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Support fraglist GRO/GSO
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Date: 2018-12-26 13:09:32
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 08:15:40PM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 10:23 AM Steffen Klassert [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This patchset adds support to do GRO/GSO by chaining packets of the same flow at the SKB frag_list pointer. This avoids the overhead to merge payloads into one big packet, and on the other end, if GSO is needed it avoids the overhead of splitting the big packet back to the native form. Patch 1 prepares GSO to handle fraglist GSO packets. Patch 2 adds the core infrastructure to do fraglist GRO/GSO. Patch 3 enables IPv4 UDP to use fraglist GRO/GSO if no GRO supported socket is found. I have only forwarding performance measurements so far: I used used my IPsec forwarding test setup for this: ------------ ------------ -->| router 1 |-------->| router 2 |-- | ------------ ------------ | | | | -------------------- | --------|Spirent Testcenter|<---------- -------------------- net-next (December 10th): Single stream UDP frame size 1460 Bytes: 1.341.700 fps (15.67 Gbps). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- net-next (December 10th) + hack to enable forwarding for standard UDP GRO: Single stream UDP frame size 1460 Bytes: 1.651.200 fps (19.28 Gbps). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- net-next (December 10th) + fraglist UDP GRO/GSO: Single stream UDP frame size 1460 Bytes: 2.742.500 fps (32.03 Gbps).That's an impressive speed-up over regular UDP GRO. Definitely worth looking into more, then. Sorry for the delay. I still haven't parsed everything yet, but a few high level questions and comments. This sounds similar to GSO_BY_FRAGS as used by SCTP. Can perhaps reuse that or deduplicate a bit. It is nice that this uses a separate skb_segment_list function; skb_segment is arguably too complex as is already.
This patchset looks like a more whole version of what GSO_BY_FRAGS is, and I like it. It should be easy to adapt SCTP to use these patches instead. I can do it if needed. Marcelo