Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/6] selftests/bpf: skip verifier tests for unsupported map types
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Date: 2018-12-19 00:02:42
Subsystem:
bpf [general] (safe dynamic programs and tools), bpf [selftests] (test runners & infrastructure), kernel selftest framework, the rest · Maintainers:
Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Shuah Khan, Linus Torvalds
On 12/19, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 12/17/2018 07:25 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:quoted
Use recently introduced bpf_map_type_supported() to skip tests in the test_verifier if map creation (create_map) fails. It's handled explicitly for each fixup, i.e. if bpf_create_map returns negative fd, we probe the kernel for the appropriate map support and skip the test is map type is not supported. Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <redacted> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 124d21306c27..d267f5248b5d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c@@ -14221,10 +14221,20 @@ static int create_cgroup_storage(bool percpu) return fd; } +static bool skip_unsupported_map(int ret, enum bpf_map_type map_type) +{ + if (ret < 0 && !bpf_map_type_supported(map_type)) { + printf("SKIP (unsupported map type %d)\n", map_type); + skips++; + return true; + } + return false; +} + static char bpf_vlog[UINT_MAX >> 8]; -static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_map_type prog_type, - struct bpf_insn *prog, int *map_fds) +static int do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_map_type prog_type, + struct bpf_insn *prog, int *map_fds) { int *fixup_map_hash_8b = test->fixup_map_hash_8b; int *fixup_map_hash_48b = test->fixup_map_hash_48b;@@ -14309,6 +14319,9 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_map_type prog_type, if (*fixup_cgroup_storage) { map_fds[7] = create_cgroup_storage(false); + if (skip_unsupported_map(map_fds[7], + BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGROUP_STORAGE)) + return -1; do { prog[*fixup_cgroup_storage].imm = map_fds[7]; fixup_cgroup_storage++;@@ -14317,6 +14330,9 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_map_type prog_type, if (*fixup_percpu_cgroup_storage) { map_fds[8] = create_cgroup_storage(true); + if (skip_unsupported_map(map_fds[8], + BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE)) + return -1; do { prog[*fixup_percpu_cgroup_storage].imm = map_fds[8]; fixup_percpu_cgroup_storage++;@@ -14325,6 +14341,8 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_map_type prog_type, if (*fixup_map_sockmap) { map_fds[9] = create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP, sizeof(int), sizeof(int), 1); + if (skip_unsupported_map(map_fds[9], BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP)) + return -1; do { prog[*fixup_map_sockmap].imm = map_fds[9]; fixup_map_sockmap++;@@ -14333,6 +14351,8 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_map_type prog_type, if (*fixup_map_sockhash) { map_fds[10] = create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKHASH, sizeof(int), sizeof(int), 1); + if (skip_unsupported_map(map_fds[10], BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKHASH)) + return -1; do { prog[*fixup_map_sockhash].imm = map_fds[10]; fixup_map_sockhash++;@@ -14341,6 +14361,8 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_map_type prog_type, if (*fixup_map_xskmap) { map_fds[11] = create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_XSKMAP, sizeof(int), sizeof(int), 1); + if (skip_unsupported_map(map_fds[11], BPF_MAP_TYPE_XSKMAP)) + return -1; do { prog[*fixup_map_xskmap].imm = map_fds[11]; fixup_map_xskmap++;@@ -14349,11 +14371,16 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_map_type prog_type, if (*fixup_map_stacktrace) { map_fds[12] = create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK_TRACE, sizeof(u32), sizeof(u64), 1); + if (skip_unsupported_map(map_fds[12], + BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK_TRACE)) + return -1;Nit: Could probably be slightly simplified by moving this into and by reworking create_{map,cgroup_storage}() a bit.
Yeah, I stated that option in the cover letter. I did that initially,
but it required some additional argument (skip/supported) to the
create_{map,cgroup_storage} and I scrapped this approach due to too
much plumbing.
But I think since we are not doing any parallel tests in the verifier,
we can do something like the following patch below. WDYT?
---
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 124d21306c27..43f71783f7b5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c@@ -14113,6 +14113,16 @@ static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp) return len + 1; } +static bool skip_unsupported_map(enum bpf_map_type map_type) +{ + if (!bpf_map_type_supported(map_type)) { + printf("SKIP (unsupported map type %d)\n", map_type); + skips++; + return true; + } + return false; +} + static int create_map(uint32_t type, uint32_t size_key, uint32_t size_value, uint32_t max_elem) {
@@ -14120,8 +14130,11 @@ static int create_map(uint32_t type, uint32_t size_key, fd = bpf_create_map(type, size_key, size_value, max_elem, type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH ? BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC : 0); - if (fd < 0) + if (fd < 0) { + if (skip_unsupported_map(type)) + return -1; printf("Failed to create hash map '%s'!\n", strerror(errno)); + } return fd; }
@@ -14161,6 +14174,8 @@ static int create_prog_array(enum bpf_map_type prog_type, uint32_t max_elem, mfd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY, sizeof(int), sizeof(int), max_elem, 0); if (mfd < 0) { + if (skip_unsupported_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY)) + return -1; printf("Failed to create prog array '%s'!\n", strerror(errno)); return -1; }
@@ -14191,15 +14206,20 @@ static int create_map_in_map(void) inner_map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, sizeof(int), sizeof(int), 1, 0); if (inner_map_fd < 0) { + if (skip_unsupported_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY)) + return -1; printf("Failed to create array '%s'!\n", strerror(errno)); return inner_map_fd; } outer_map_fd = bpf_create_map_in_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, NULL, sizeof(int), inner_map_fd, 1, 0); - if (outer_map_fd < 0) + if (outer_map_fd < 0) { + if (skip_unsupported_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS)) + return -1; printf("Failed to create array of maps '%s'!\n", strerror(errno)); + } close(inner_map_fd);
@@ -14214,9 +14234,12 @@ static int create_cgroup_storage(bool percpu) fd = bpf_create_map(type, sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage_key), TEST_DATA_LEN, 0, 0); - if (fd < 0) + if (fd < 0) { + if (skip_unsupported_map(type)) + return -1; printf("Failed to create cgroup storage '%s'!\n", strerror(errno)); + } return fd; }
@@ -14392,6 +14415,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, int map_fds[MAX_NR_MAPS]; const char *expected_err; uint32_t expected_val; + int fixup_skips; uint32_t retval; __u32 pflags; int i, err;
@@ -14401,7 +14425,13 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, if (!prog_type) prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER; + fixup_skips = skips; do_test_fixup(test, prog_type, prog, map_fds); + /* If there were some map skips during fixup due to missing bpf + * features, skip this test. + */ + if (fixup_skips != skips) + return; prog_len = probe_filter_length(prog); pflags = 0;
quoted
do { prog[*fixup_map_stacktrace].imm = map_fds[12]; fixup_map_stacktrace++; } while (fixup_map_stacktrace); } + + return 0; } static int set_admin(bool admin)@@ -14401,7 +14428,8 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, if (!prog_type) prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER; - do_test_fixup(test, prog_type, prog, map_fds); + if (do_test_fixup(test, prog_type, prog, map_fds) < 0) + return; prog_len = probe_filter_length(prog); pflags = 0;