Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net: bpfilter: restart bpfilter_umh when error occurred
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2018-12-15 00:58:31
From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 10:19:26 +0900
When bpfilter error occurred bpfilter_umh will be stopped via __stop_umh().
The bpfilter_umh() couldn't start again because there is no restart
routine.
The section of bpfilter_umh_{start/end} is no longer .init.rodata
because these area should be reused in the restart routine. hence
the section name is changed to .bpfilter_umh.
Test commands:
$ iptables -vnL
$ kill -9 <pid of bpfilter_umh>
$ iptables -vnL
[ 480.045136] bpfilter: write fail -32
$ iptables -vnL
iptables v1.8.1 (legacy): can't initialize iptables table `filter': No child processes
Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded.
Then, iptables command is always failed.
Fixes: d2ba09c17a06 ("net: add skeleton of bpfilter kernel module")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>Thank you for this fix, but I am unsure if this is a complete solution. First of all, you can only kill the bpfilter_umh as root right? It is a big problem to allow the userspace to kill the umh program because that will result in the pipes being leaked. Normally the kernel takes down bpfilter_umh and calls fput() on the pipe file descriptors via shutdown_umh(). In the kill -9 example above, that does not happen and that is why we get the fd leak. In this situation it will not reset info->pid to zero, and it also will leave bpfilter_process_socktop non-NULL. Therefore, it seems like the kernel has to perform these cleanup actions if the bpfilter_umh process dies (from kill -9, or just crashing). And I think if you manage that properly it will fix this bug too.