Re: [PATCH] vhost: fix IOTLB locking
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <hidden>
Date: 2018-12-01 02:43:35
Also in:
kvm
On 30/11/2018 13:32, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:37:02AM +0000, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:quoted
Commit 78139c94dc8c ("net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one") moved the vq lock to improve scalability, but introduced a possible deadlock in vhost-iotlb. vhost_iotlb_notify_vq() now takes vq->mutex while holding the device's IOTLB spinlock.Indeed spin_lock is just outside this snippet. Yack.quoted
And on the vhost_iotlb_miss() path, the spinlock is taken while holding vq->mutex. As long as we hold dev->mutex to prevent an ioctl from modifying vq->poll concurrently, we can safely call vhost_poll_queue() without holding vq->mutex. Since vhost_process_iotlb_msg() holds dev->mutex when calling vhost_iotlb_notify_vq(), avoid the deadlock by not taking vq->mutex. Fixes: 78139c94dc8c ("net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one") Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <redacted>Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> but see below for a minor comment. I guess we now need this on stable?
I don't think so, the bug is introduced in 4.20
quoted
--- drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c index 3a5f81a66d34..1cbb17f898f7 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c@@ -944,10 +944,10 @@ static void vhost_iotlb_notify_vq(struct vhost_dev *d, if (msg->iova <= vq_msg->iova && msg->iova + msg->size - 1 >= vq_msg->iova && vq_msg->type == VHOST_IOTLB_MISS) { - mutex_lock(&node->vq->mutex); + /* Safe to call outside vq->mutex as long as dev->mutex + * is held. + */ vhost_poll_queue(&node->vq->poll); - mutex_unlock(&node->vq->mutex); -In fact vhost_poll_queue is generally lockless so it's safe to call without any locks.
Right, I'll remove the comment Thanks, Jean
quoted
list_del(&node->node); kfree(node);quoted
} -- 2.19.1_______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization