Re: [PATCH 7/8] socket: Add SO_TIMESTAMP[NS]_NEW
From: Deepa Dinamani <hidden>
Date: 2018-11-30 22:43:24
Also in:
linux-alpha, linux-mips, linux-rdma, lkml, sparclinux
From: Deepa Dinamani <hidden>
Date: 2018-11-30 22:43:24
Also in:
linux-alpha, linux-mips, linux-rdma, lkml, sparclinux
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:33 AM Willem de Bruijn [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 12:28 AM Deepa Dinamani [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ if (type == SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW || type == SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW) + sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW); + else + sock_reset_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW); +if adding a boolean whether the socket uses new or old-style timestamps, perhaps fail hard if a process tries to set a new-style option while an old-style is already set and vice versa. Also include SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW as it toggles the same option.I do not think this is a problem. Consider this example, if there is a user application with updated socket timestamps is linking into a library that is yet to be updated.Also consider applications that do not use libraries.
Arnd and I talked about this. We thought that the new options should behave like the already existing options. The patch already does this. Eg: Today if we set SO_TIMESTAMP and then try to switch to SO_TIMESTAMPNS then there is no fail. Do you still want a hard fail? -Deepa