Thread (35 messages) 35 messages, 4 authors, 2018-11-30

Re: [PATCH 7/8] socket: Add SO_TIMESTAMP[NS]_NEW

From: Deepa Dinamani <hidden>
Date: 2018-11-30 22:43:24
Also in: linux-alpha, linux-mips, linux-rdma, lkml, sparclinux

On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:33 AM Willem de Bruijn
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 12:28 AM Deepa Dinamani [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+       if (type == SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW || type == SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW)
+               sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW);
+       else
+               sock_reset_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW);
+
if adding a boolean whether the socket uses new or old-style
timestamps, perhaps fail hard if a process tries to set a new-style
option while an old-style is already set and vice versa. Also include
SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW as it toggles the same option.
I do not think this is a problem.
Consider this example, if there is a user application with updated
socket timestamps is linking into a library that is yet to be updated.
Also consider applications that do not use libraries.
Arnd and I talked about this.
We thought that the new options should behave like the already
existing options. The patch already does this.
Eg: Today if we set SO_TIMESTAMP and then try to switch to
SO_TIMESTAMPNS then there is no fail.

Do you still want a hard fail?

-Deepa
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help