Re: [PATCH net-next v3 01/13] virtio: add packed ring types and macros
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2018-11-30 15:53:16
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:37:37PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 08:52:42AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:quoted
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 02:01:06PM +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote:quoted
On 11/30/18 1:47 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:quoted
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 05:53:40PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:quoted
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 04:10:55PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
On 2018/11/21 下午6:03, Tiwei Bie wrote:quoted
Add types and macros for packed ring. Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <redacted> --- include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h | 3 +++ include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+)diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h index 449132c76b1c..1196e1c1d4f6 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h@@ -75,6 +75,9 @@ */ #define VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM 33 +/* This feature indicates support for the packed virtqueue layout. */ +#define VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED 34 + /* * Does the device support Single Root I/O Virtualization? */diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h index 6d5d5faa989b..2414f8af26b3 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h@@ -44,6 +44,13 @@ /* This means the buffer contains a list of buffer descriptors. */ #define VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT 4 +/* + * Mark a descriptor as available or used in packed ring. + * Notice: they are defined as shifts instead of shifted values.This looks inconsistent to previous flags, any reason for using shifts?Yeah, it was suggested to use shifts, as _F_ should be a bit number, not a shifted value: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/942296/#1989390But let's add a _SPLIT_ variant that uses shifts consistently.Maybe we could avoid adding SPLIT and PACKED, but define as follow: #define VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT_SHIFT 2 #define VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT (1ull << VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT_SHIFT) #define VRING_DESC_F_AVAIL_SHIFT 7 #define VRING_DESC_F_AVAIL (1ull << VRING_DESC_F_AVAIL_SHIFT) I think it would be better for consistency.I don't think that will help. the problem is that most of the existing virtio code consistently uses _F_ as shifts. So we just need to do something about these 5 being inconsistent: include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h:#define VRING_DESC_F_NEXT 1 include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h:#define VRING_DESC_F_WRITE 2 include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h:#define VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT 4 include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h:#define VRING_USED_F_NO_NOTIFY 1 include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h:#define VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT 1 I do not want all of virtio to become verbose with _SHIFT, ergo we need to change the above 5 to have names which are with _F_ and have the bit number.How about something like this: #define VRING_COMM_DESC_F_NEXT 0 #define VRING_COMM_DESC_F_WRITE 1 #define VRING_COMM_DESC_F_INDIRECT 2 #define VRING_SPLIT_USED_F_NO_NOTIFY 0 #define VRING_SPLIT_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT 0 or #define VRING_SPLIT_DESC_F_NEXT 0 #define VRING_SPLIT_DESC_F_WRITE 1 #define VRING_SPLIT_DESC_F_INDIRECT 2 #define VRING_SPLIT_USED_F_NO_NOTIFY 0 #define VRING_SPLIT_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT 0 #define VRING_PACKED_DESC_F_NEXT 0 #define VRING_PACKED_DESC_F_WRITE 1 #define VRING_PACKED_DESC_F_INDIRECT 2
As we aren't sharing code I think I prefer the second form. Maybe add VRING_NO_LEGACY so people can audit their code for assumptions? We also want to guard layout definitions at the end of that file I think.
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ */ +#define VRING_PACKED_DESC_F_AVAIL 7 +#define VRING_PACKED_DESC_F_USED 15 + /* The Host uses this in used->flags to advise the Guest: don't kick me when * you add a buffer. It's unreliable, so it's simply an optimization. Guest * will still kick if it's out of buffers. */@@ -53,6 +60,23 @@ * optimization. */ #define VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT 1 +/* Enable events in packed ring. */ +#define VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_ENABLE 0x0 +/* Disable events in packed ring. */ +#define VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE 0x1 +/* + * Enable events for a specific descriptor in packed ring. + * (as specified by Descriptor Ring Change Event Offset/Wrap Counter). + * Only valid if VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX has been negotiated. + */ +#define VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DESC 0x2Any reason for using _FLAG_ instead of _F_?Yeah, it was suggested to not use _F_, as these are values, should not have _F_: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/942296/#1989390 Regards, Tiweiquoted
Thanksquoted
+ +/* + * Wrap counter bit shift in event suppression structure + * of packed ring. + */ +#define VRING_PACKED_EVENT_F_WRAP_CTR 15 + /* We support indirect buffer descriptors */ #define VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC 28@@ -171,4 +195,32 @@ static inline int vring_need_event(__u16 event_idx, __u16 new_idx, __u16 old) return (__u16)(new_idx - event_idx - 1) < (__u16)(new_idx - old); } +struct vring_packed_desc_event { + /* Descriptor Ring Change Event Offset/Wrap Counter. */ + __le16 off_wrap; + /* Descriptor Ring Change Event Flags. */ + __le16 flags; +}; + +struct vring_packed_desc { + /* Buffer Address. */ + __le64 addr; + /* Buffer Length. */ + __le32 len; + /* Buffer ID. */ + __le16 id; + /* The flags depending on descriptor type. */ + __le16 flags; +}; + +struct vring_packed { + unsigned int num; + + struct vring_packed_desc *desc; + + struct vring_packed_desc_event *driver; + + struct vring_packed_desc_event *device; +}; + #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_RING_H */