Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2018-12-03

Re: [PATCH net] tun: remove skb access after netif_receive_skb

From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: 2018-11-30 13:48:27

On 2018/11/30 上午10:30, Prashant Bhole wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
In tun.c skb->len was accessed while doing stats accounting after a
call to netif_receive_skb. We can not access skb after this call
because buffers may be dropped.

The fix for this bug would be to store skb->len in local variable and
then use it after netif_receive_skb(). IMO using xdp data size for
accounting bytes will be better because input for tun_xdp_one() is
xdp_buff.

Hence this patch:
- fixes a bug by removing skb access after netif_receive_skb()
- uses xdp data size for accounting bytes

[613.019057] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in tun_sendmsg+0x77c/0xc50 [tun]
[613.021062] Read of size 4 at addr ffff8881da9ab7c0 by task vhost-1115/1155
[613.023073]
[613.024003] CPU: 0 PID: 1155 Comm: vhost-1115 Not tainted 4.20.0-rc3-vm+ #232
[613.026029] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[613.029116] Call Trace:
[613.031145]  dump_stack+0x5b/0x90
[613.032219]  print_address_description+0x6c/0x23c
[613.034156]  ? tun_sendmsg+0x77c/0xc50 [tun]
[613.036141]  kasan_report.cold.5+0x241/0x308
[613.038125]  tun_sendmsg+0x77c/0xc50 [tun]
[613.040109]  ? tun_get_user+0x1960/0x1960 [tun]
[613.042094]  ? __isolate_free_page+0x270/0x270
[613.045173]  vhost_tx_batch.isra.14+0xeb/0x1f0 [vhost_net]
[613.047127]  ? peek_head_len.part.13+0x90/0x90 [vhost_net]
[613.049096]  ? get_tx_bufs+0x5a/0x2c0 [vhost_net]
[613.051106]  ? vhost_enable_notify+0x2d8/0x420 [vhost]
[613.053139]  handle_tx_copy+0x2d0/0x8f0 [vhost_net]
[613.053139]  ? vhost_net_buf_peek+0x340/0x340 [vhost_net]
[613.053139]  ? __mutex_lock+0x8d9/0xb30
[613.053139]  ? finish_task_switch+0x8f/0x3f0
[613.053139]  ? handle_tx+0x32/0x120 [vhost_net]
[613.053139]  ? mutex_trylock+0x110/0x110
[613.053139]  ? finish_task_switch+0xcf/0x3f0
[613.053139]  ? finish_task_switch+0x240/0x3f0
[613.053139]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
[613.053139]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
[613.053139]  ? __schedule+0x506/0xf10
[613.053139]  handle_tx+0xc7/0x120 [vhost_net]
[613.053139]  vhost_worker+0x166/0x200 [vhost]
[613.053139]  ? vhost_dev_init+0x580/0x580 [vhost]
[613.053139]  ? __kthread_parkme+0x77/0x90
[613.053139]  ? vhost_dev_init+0x580/0x580 [vhost]
[613.053139]  kthread+0x1b1/0x1d0
[613.053139]  ? kthread_park+0xb0/0xb0
[613.053139]  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
[613.088705]
[613.088705] Allocated by task 1155:
[613.088705]  kasan_kmalloc+0xbf/0xe0
[613.088705]  kmem_cache_alloc+0xdc/0x220
[613.088705]  __build_skb+0x2a/0x160
[613.088705]  build_skb+0x14/0xc0
[613.088705]  tun_sendmsg+0x4f0/0xc50 [tun]
[613.088705]  vhost_tx_batch.isra.14+0xeb/0x1f0 [vhost_net]
[613.088705]  handle_tx_copy+0x2d0/0x8f0 [vhost_net]
[613.088705]  handle_tx+0xc7/0x120 [vhost_net]
[613.088705]  vhost_worker+0x166/0x200 [vhost]
[613.088705]  kthread+0x1b1/0x1d0
[613.088705]  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
[613.088705]
[613.088705] Freed by task 1155:
[613.088705]  __kasan_slab_free+0x12e/0x180
[613.088705]  kmem_cache_free+0xa0/0x230
[613.088705]  ip6_mc_input+0x40f/0x5a0
[613.088705]  ipv6_rcv+0xc9/0x1e0
[613.088705]  __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0xc1/0x100
[613.088705]  netif_receive_skb_internal+0xc4/0x270
[613.088705]  br_pass_frame_up+0x2b9/0x2e0
[613.088705]  br_handle_frame_finish+0x2fb/0x7a0
[613.088705]  br_handle_frame+0x30f/0x6c0
[613.088705]  __netif_receive_skb_core+0x61a/0x15b0
[613.088705]  __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x8e/0x100
[613.088705]  netif_receive_skb_internal+0xc4/0x270
[613.088705]  tun_sendmsg+0x738/0xc50 [tun]
[613.088705]  vhost_tx_batch.isra.14+0xeb/0x1f0 [vhost_net]
[613.088705]  handle_tx_copy+0x2d0/0x8f0 [vhost_net]
[613.088705]  handle_tx+0xc7/0x120 [vhost_net]
[613.088705]  vhost_worker+0x166/0x200 [vhost]
[613.088705]  kthread+0x1b1/0x1d0
[613.088705]  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
[613.088705]
[613.088705] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8881da9ab740
[613.088705]  which belongs to the cache skbuff_head_cache of size 232

Fixes: 043d222f93ab ("tuntap: accept an array of XDP buffs through sendmsg()")
Reviewed-by: Toshiaki Makita <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Prashant Bhole <redacted>
---
  drivers/net/tun.c | 3 ++-
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
index e244f5d7512a..6e388792c0a8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -2385,6 +2385,7 @@ static int tun_xdp_one(struct tun_struct *tun,
  		       struct tun_file *tfile,
  		       struct xdp_buff *xdp, int *flush)
  {
+	unsigned int datasize = xdp->data_end - xdp->data;
  	struct tun_xdp_hdr *hdr = xdp->data_hard_start;
  	struct virtio_net_hdr *gso = &hdr->gso;
  	struct tun_pcpu_stats *stats;
@@ -2461,7 +2462,7 @@ static int tun_xdp_one(struct tun_struct *tun,
  	stats = get_cpu_ptr(tun->pcpu_stats);
  	u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->syncp);
  	stats->rx_packets++;
-	stats->rx_bytes += skb->len;
+	stats->rx_bytes += datasize;
  	u64_stats_update_end(&stats->syncp);
  	put_cpu_ptr(stats);
  

Good catch, but you probably need to calculate the datasize after XDP 
processing since it may modify the packet length.

Thanks
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help