Thread (33 messages) 33 messages, 3 authors, 2018-10-17
STALE2816d REVIEWED: 4 (4M)
Revisions (2)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 current

[PATCH stable 4.9 v2 07/29] rhashtable: add schedule points

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: 2018-10-11 02:54:12
Also in: stable
Subsystem: library code, rhashtable, the rest · Maintainers: Andrew Morton, Thomas Graf, Herbert Xu, Linus Torvalds

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

Rehashing and destroying large hash table takes a lot of time,
and happens in process context. It is safe to add cond_resched()
in rhashtable_rehash_table() and rhashtable_free_and_destroy()

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
(cherry picked from commit ae6da1f503abb5a5081f9f6c4a6881de97830f3e)
---
 lib/rhashtable.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/rhashtable.c b/lib/rhashtable.c
index 101dac085c62..fdffd6232365 100644
--- a/lib/rhashtable.c
+++ b/lib/rhashtable.c
@@ -251,8 +251,10 @@ static int rhashtable_rehash_table(struct rhashtable *ht)
 	if (!new_tbl)
 		return 0;
 
-	for (old_hash = 0; old_hash < old_tbl->size; old_hash++)
+	for (old_hash = 0; old_hash < old_tbl->size; old_hash++) {
 		rhashtable_rehash_chain(ht, old_hash);
+		cond_resched();
+	}
 
 	/* Publish the new table pointer. */
 	rcu_assign_pointer(ht->tbl, new_tbl);
@@ -993,6 +995,7 @@ void rhashtable_free_and_destroy(struct rhashtable *ht,
 		for (i = 0; i < tbl->size; i++) {
 			struct rhash_head *pos, *next;
 
+			cond_resched();
 			for (pos = rht_dereference(tbl->buckets[i], ht),
 			     next = !rht_is_a_nulls(pos) ?
 					rht_dereference(pos->next, ht) : NULL;
-- 
2.17.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help