Thread (34 messages) 34 messages, 3 authors, 2018-10-11

Re: [PATCH stable 4.9 00/29] backport of IP fragmentation fixes

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: 2018-10-11 06:47:46
Also in: stable

On 10/10/2018 04:18 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 21:15:04 -0700
Florian Fainelli [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
Strange, I do not see "ip: use rb trees for IP frag queue." in this list ?  
And it was not in Stephen's backport to 4.14 either, wait, looks like it
was somehow squashed into "net: sk_buff rbnode reorg". Stephen, was
there a reason for that?

Let me go back and add bffa72cf7f9df842f0016ba03586039296b4caaf as well
as eeea10b83a139451130df1594f26710c8fa390c8 to the rebase todo and see
how things go from there.

Thanks for taking a look.
I don't remember, spent time doing cherry-pick and fixups. Maybe the reorg
commit got squashed as part of one rebase.
No worries, I ended dropping these two commits because they would have
required cherry-picking "udp: copy skb->truesize in the first cache
line" which did not seem appropriate. I would appreciate if you could
take a look at v2 and confirm this does look good, in particular the
struct sk_buff layout.

Thanks!
-- 
Florian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help