On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 8:50 PM Dave Jones [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 11:40:47PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > This is exactly what I mentioned in my review here:
> > https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153816136624679&w=2
> >
> > "But irq is disabled here, so not sure if rcu_read_lock_bh()
> > could cause trouble... "
>
> Not sure why this didn't show up for me when I was developing that
> patch, but I can now reproduce this. The patch below fixes it for
> me, but I'm not sure if there are still any side-effects.
> There's also a missed unlock in the error path.
I took another look at that error path. Turns out this is all we need I
think..
Double check if rcu_dereference_bh() is happy with it.
Don't trust me, enable the relevant Kconfig and trust your test. ;)