Re: Re: BUG: corrupted list in p9_read_work

Dmitry Vyukov wrote on Wed, Oct 10, 2018:

quoted

quoted

Back to the current patch, since as I said I am not confident this is a
good enough fix for the current bug, will I get notified if the bug
happens again once the patch hits linux-next with the Reported-by tag ?
(I don't have the setup necessary to run a syz repro as there is no C
repro, and won't have much time to do that setup sorry)

quoted

Yes, the bug will be reported again if it still happens after the
patch is merged (not just into linux-next, but into all tested trees,
but it does not matter much). So marking bugs as fixed tentatively is
fine if that's our best guess.

Ok, thanks for confirming...

quoted

But note that syzbot can test fixes itself on request. It boils down
to just giving it the patch and the base tree:
https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/docs/syzbot.md#testing-patches

.. and for clarifying that bit, let's try that! :)

#syz test: git://github.com/martinetd/linux  
e4ca13f7d075e551dc158df6af18fb412a1dba0a

"git://github.com/martinetd/linux" does not look like a valid git repo  
address.

--
Dominique