Re: [PATCH] gigaset: asyncdata: mark expected switch fall-throughs
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2018-10-05 18:51:34
Also in:
lkml
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <redacted> Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 15:29:09 +0200
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the
" --v-- fall through --v-- " comment with a proper
"fall through", which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364476 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364477 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <redacted>Applied.