Re: [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 01/25] net/netlink: Pass extack to dump callbacks

---
 include/linux/netlink.h  |  2 ++
 net/core/rtnetlink.c     |  1 +
 net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/netlink.h b/include/linux/netlink.h
index 71f121b66ca8..8fc90308a653 100644
--- a/include/linux/netlink.h
+++ b/include/linux/netlink.h

@@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ struct netlink_callback {
 	void			*data;
 	/* the module that dump function belong to */
 	struct module		*module;
+	struct netlink_ext_ack	*extack;
 	u16			family;
 	u16			min_dump_alloc;
 	unsigned int		prev_seq, seq;

@@ -197,6 +198,7 @@ struct netlink_dump_control {
 	int (*done)(struct netlink_callback *);
 	void *data;
 	struct module *module;
+	struct netlink_ext_ack *extack;
 	u16 min_dump_alloc;
 };
 

diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index 35162e1b06ad..da91b38297d3 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c

@@ -4689,6 +4689,7 @@ static int rtnetlink_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 				.dump		= dumpit,
 				.min_dump_alloc	= min_dump_alloc,
 				.module		= owner,
+				.extack		= extack
 			};
 			err = netlink_dump_start(rtnl, skb, nlh, &c);
 			/* netlink_dump_start() will keep a reference on

diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index e3a0538ec0be..7094156c94f0 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c

@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static const char *const nlk_cb_mutex_key_strings[MAX_LINKS + 1] = {
 	"nlk_cb_mutex-MAX_LINKS"
 };
 
-static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk);
+static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
 
 /* nl_table locking explained:
  * Lookup and traversal are protected with an RCU read-side lock. Insertion

@@ -1981,7 +1981,7 @@ static int netlink_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
 
 	if (nlk->cb_running &&
 	    atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) <= sk->sk_rcvbuf / 2) {
-		ret = netlink_dump(sk);
+		ret = netlink_dump(sk, NULL);
 		if (ret) {
 			sk->sk_err = -ret;
 			sk->sk_error_report(sk);

@@ -2168,7 +2168,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__nlmsg_put);
  * It would be better to create kernel thread.
  */
 
-static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk)
+static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 {
 	struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
 	struct netlink_callback *cb;

@@ -2222,8 +2222,11 @@ static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk)
 	skb_reserve(skb, skb_tailroom(skb) - alloc_size);
 	netlink_skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
 
-	if (nlk->dump_done_errno > 0)
+	if (nlk->dump_done_errno > 0) {
+		cb->extack = extack;
 		nlk->dump_done_errno = cb->dump(skb, cb);
+		cb->extack = NULL;
+	}
 
 	if (nlk->dump_done_errno > 0 ||
 	    skb_tailroom(skb) < nlmsg_total_size(sizeof(nlk->dump_done_errno))) {

@@ -2246,6 +2249,12 @@ static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk)
 	memcpy(nlmsg_data(nlh), &nlk->dump_done_errno,
 	       sizeof(nlk->dump_done_errno));
 
+	if (extack && extack->_msg && nlk->flags & NETLINK_F_EXT_ACK) {
+		nlh->nlmsg_flags |= NLM_F_ACK_TLVS;
+		if (!nla_put_string(skb, NLMSGERR_ATTR_MSG, extack->_msg))
+			nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
+	}
+
 	if (sk_filter(sk, skb))
 		kfree_skb(skb);
 	else

@@ -2307,6 +2316,7 @@ int __netlink_dump_start(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	cb->module = control->module;
 	cb->min_dump_alloc = control->min_dump_alloc;
 	cb->skb = skb;
+	cb->extack = control->extack;
 
 	if (control->start) {
 		ret = control->start(cb);

@@ -2319,7 +2329,7 @@ int __netlink_dump_start(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 
 	mutex_unlock(nlk->cb_mutex);
 
-	ret = netlink_dump(sk);
+	ret = netlink_dump(sk, cb->extack);
 
 	sock_put(sk);
 

-- 
2.11.0