Thread (39 messages) flat view 39 messages, 2 authors, 2018-09-10

Re: [PATCH net-next 07/11] tuntap: move XDP flushing out of tun_do_xdp()

From: Jason Wang <hidden>
Date: 2018-09-07 03:31:49
Also in: kvm, lkml


On 2018年09月07日 01:48, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 12:05:22PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
quoted
This will allow adding batch flushing on top.

Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <redacted>
---
  drivers/net/tun.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
index 21b125020b3b..ff1cbf3ebd50 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -1646,7 +1646,6 @@ static u32 tun_do_xdp(struct tun_struct *tun,
  	switch (act) {
  	case XDP_REDIRECT:
  		*err = xdp_do_redirect(tun->dev, xdp, xdp_prog);
-		xdp_do_flush_map();
  		if (*err)
  			break;
  		goto out;
@@ -1735,6 +1734,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *tun_build_skb(struct tun_struct *tun,
  		act = tun_do_xdp(tun, tfile, xdp_prog, &xdp, &err);
  		if (err)
  			goto err_xdp;
+
+		if (act == XDP_REDIRECT)
+			xdp_do_flush_map();
  		if (act != XDP_PASS)
  			goto out;
At this point the switch statement which used to contain all XDP things
seems to be gone completely. Just rewrite with a bunch of if statements
and all xdp handling spread out to where it makes sense?
But tun_do_xdp() will be reused in the batching path.

Thanks
quoted
-- 
2.17.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help