Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 3 authors, 2018-09-20

Re: [PATCH rdma-next 1/5] RDMA/core: Provide getter and setter to access IB device name

From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Date: 2018-09-20 22:25:03
Also in: linux-rdma, linux-s390

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 09:15:41AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 02:21:58PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
quoted
From: Leon Romanovsky <redacted>

Prepare IB device name field to rename operation by ensuring that all
accesses to it are protected with lock and users don't see part of name.
Oh dear, no, that isn't going to work, there is too much stuff using
dev_name.. Did you read the comment on device_rename??

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.19-rc4/source/drivers/base/core.c#L2715
Yes, I read, it was mentioned in the cover letter.
quoted
The protection is done with global device_lock because it is used in
allocation and deallocation phases. At this stage, this lock is not
busy and easily can be moved to be per-device, once it will be needed.

Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <redacted>
 drivers/infiniband/core/device.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 include/rdma/ib_verbs.h          |  8 +++++++-
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
index 5a680a88aa87..3270cde6d806 100644
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
@@ -170,6 +170,14 @@ static struct ib_device *__ib_device_get_by_name(const char *name)
 	return NULL;
 }

+void ib_device_get_name(struct ib_device *ibdev, char *name)
+{
+	down_read(&lists_rwsem);
+	strlcpy(name, ibdev->name, IB_DEVICE_NAME_MAX);
+	up_read(&lists_rwsem);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_device_get_name);
I think we have to follow netdev and just rely on device_rename()
being 'good enough'.

Switch everything to use dev_name()/etc rather than try and do
something like this so the responsibility is on the device core to
keep this working, not us.

Turns out I have a series for that for unrelated reasons..
And what should I do now with this knowledge?
quoted
 static int alloc_name(char *name)
 {
 	unsigned long *inuse;
@@ -202,6 +210,21 @@ static int alloc_name(char *name)
 	return 0;
 }

+int ib_device_alloc_name(struct ib_device *ibdev, const char *pattern)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&device_mutex);
+	strlcpy(ibdev->name, pattern, IB_DEVICE_NAME_MAX);
+	if (strchr(ibdev->name, '%'))
+		ret = alloc_name(ibdev->name);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&device_mutex);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_device_alloc_name);
Can't call alloc_name() without also adding to the list, this will
allow duplicates.
I planned to change it in the future by moving to different name scheme
with unique naming.
Jason

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help