On Wed 19 Sep 2018 at 22:04, Cong Wang [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:19 AM Vlad Buslov [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+static void tcf_qdisc_put(struct Qdisc *q, bool rtnl_held)
+{
+ if (!q)
+ return;
+
+ if (rtnl_held)
+ qdisc_put(q);
+ else
+ qdisc_put_unlocked(q);
+}
This is very ugly. You should know whether RTNL is held or
not when calling it.
What's more, all of your code passes true, so why do you
need a parameter for rtnl_held?
It passes true because currently rule update handlers still registered
as locked. This is a preparation for next patch set where this would be
changed to proper variable that depends on qdics and classifier type.