[PATCH net-next 0/2] net: phy: make phy_stop() synchronous · Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> · 2018-09-19
[PATCH net-next 1/2] net: linkwatch: add check for netdevice being present to linkwatch_do_dev · Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> · 2018-09-19
Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: linkwatch: add check for netdevice being present to linkwatch_do_dev · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> · 2018-09-19
Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: linkwatch: add check for netdevice being present to linkwatch_do_dev · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2018-09-20
[PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: call state machine synchronously in phy_stop · Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> · 2018-09-19
Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: call state machine synchronously in phy_stop · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> · 2018-09-19
Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: call state machine synchronously in phy_stop · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2018-09-20
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: phy: make phy_stop() synchronous · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2018-09-20

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: phy: make phy_stop() synchronous

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2018-09-20 09:48:26

From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 21:54:23 +0200

There have been few not that successful attempts in the past to make
phy_stop() a synchronous call instead of just changing the state.
Patch 1 of this series addresses an issue which prevented this change.
At least for me it works fine now. Would appreciate if Geert could
re-test as well that suspend doesn't throw an error.

Series applied, thank you.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help