On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 08:20:44AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:

On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 03:58:23PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 02:18:51PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:

quoted

+static int UVERBS_HANDLER(MLX5_IB_METHOD_FLOW_ACTION_CREATE_MODIFY_HEADER)(
+	struct ib_uverbs_file *file,
+	struct uverbs_attr_bundle *attrs)
+{
+	struct ib_uobject *uobj = uverbs_attr_get_uobject(
+		attrs, MLX5_IB_ATTR_CREATE_MODIFY_HEADER_HANDLE);
+	struct mlx5_ib_dev *mdev = to_mdev(uobj->context->device);
+	enum mlx5_ib_uapi_flow_table_type ft_type;
+	struct ib_flow_action *action;
+	size_t num_actions;
+	void *in;
+	int len;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!mlx5_ib_modify_header_supported(mdev))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	in = uverbs_attr_get_alloced_ptr(attrs,
+		MLX5_IB_ATTR_CREATE_MODIFY_HEADER_ACTIONS_PRM);
+	len = uverbs_attr_get_len(attrs,
+		MLX5_IB_ATTR_CREATE_MODIFY_HEADER_ACTIONS_PRM);
+
+	if (len % MLX5_UN_SZ_BYTES(set_action_in_add_action_in_auto))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = uverbs_get_const(&ft_type, attrs,
+			       MLX5_IB_ATTR_CREATE_MODIFY_HEADER_FT_TYPE);
+	if (ret)
+		return -EINVAL;

This should be

	if (ret)
		return ret;

Every call to uverbs_get_const is wrong in this same way..

Right, from technical point of view uverbs_get_const can return EINVAL
only, and it is correct for now, but need to be changed to proper
"return ret".

No, it can return ENOENT as well.

Jason