On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 12:40:03AM -0700, syzbot wrote:

CPU: 1 PID: 12694 Comm: syz-executor0 Not tainted 4.18.0+ #107
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x1c9/0x2b4 lib/dump_stack.c:113
 print_address_description+0x6c/0x20b mm/kasan/report.c:256
 kasan_report_error mm/kasan/report.c:354 [inline]
 kasan_report.cold.7+0x242/0x30d mm/kasan/report.c:412
 __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x14/0x20 mm/kasan/report.c:433
 sctp_transport_get_next+0x11c/0x140 net/sctp/socket.c:5008
 sctp_transport_get_idx net/sctp/socket.c:5022 [inline]

It is iterating over transports but then also accessing the
association directly, without checking any refcnts before that.

struct sctp_transport *sctp_transport_get_next(struct net *net,
					       struct rhashtable_iter *iter)
{
	struct sctp_transport *t;

	t = rhashtable_walk_next(iter);
	for (; t; t = rhashtable_walk_next(iter)) {
		if (IS_ERR(t)) {
			if (PTR_ERR(t) == -EAGAIN)
				continue;
			break;
		}

		if (net_eq(sock_net(t->asoc->base.sk), net) &&
		    t->asoc->peer.primary_path == t)
			break;

and these t->asoc->  are risky because transport may be laying dead on
the water already, as transports are freed by RCU and associations are
not.