Stanislaw Gruszka [off-list ref] writes:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 08:41:28AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
I thought SPDX line is needed only if file has no license and eeprom.c
file and other mt76x0 files have specified the license. Is SPDX still
needed in that case ?
I thought all source files needed SPDX: https://lwn.net/Articles/739183/
Ok, goal is to have all kernel source files with SPDX header.
Yeah, it's a goal but I don't think it's a hard requirement yet. At
least I don't see it as a reason to reject patches.
And besides, mt76 uses ISC license and that's not in LICENSES directory.
So someone should add that first, and I think that patch should go via
Jonathan Corbet's tree (CCed).
--
Kalle Valo