Thread (37 messages) 37 messages, 3 authors, 2018-08-08

Re: [PATCH 24/33] net/mlx5e: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

From: Saeed Mahameed <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-08 22:26:52
Also in: linux-rdma, lkml

On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva
[off-list ref] wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114808 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114802 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <redacted>
Acked-by: Saeed Mahameed <redacted>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xdp.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xdp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xdp.c
index 1881468..ad6d471 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xdp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xdp.c
@@ -91,9 +91,11 @@ bool mlx5e_xdp_handle(struct mlx5e_rq *rq, struct mlx5e_dma_info *di,
                return true;
        default:
                bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act);
+               /* fall through */
        case XDP_ABORTED:
 xdp_abort:
                trace_xdp_exception(rq->netdev, prog, act);
+               /* fall through */
        case XDP_DROP:
                rq->stats->xdp_drop++;
                return true;
--
2.7.4
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help