Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] virtio-net: get rid of unnecessary container of rq stats
From: Toshiaki Makita <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-01 01:47:25
Also in:
lkml, virtualization
On 2018/08/01 10:39, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年07月31日 18:02, Toshiaki Makita wrote:quoted
On 2018/07/31 18:43, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
We don't maintain tx counters in rx stats any more. There's no need for an extra container of rq stats. Cc: Toshiaki Makita <redacted> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> --- drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c index 72d3f68..14f661c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c@@ -87,7 +87,8 @@ struct virtnet_sq_stats {u64 kicks; }; -struct virtnet_rq_stat_items { +struct virtnet_rq_stats { + struct u64_stats_sync syncp; u64 packets; u64 bytes; u64 drops;@@ -98,17 +99,8 @@ struct virtnet_rq_stat_items {u64 kicks; }; -struct virtnet_rq_stats { - struct u64_stats_sync syncp; - struct virtnet_rq_stat_items items; -};I'm not thinking removing sq stat is needed but even if it is I want to keep virtnet_rq_stats to avoid allocating unnecessary u64_stats_syncp on stack in virtnet_receive. I would just remove virtnet_rx_stats if necessary.It's a nop on 64bit machines. And an unsigned on 32bit. So it's overhead could be ignored I think.
It's not a big problem so that's OK. I just felt like you reverted unnecessarily too much. Anyway it is already applied and I'm not thinking of changing this any more. -- Toshiaki Makita _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization