On 2018年08月21日 08:33, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年08月19日 20:11, xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com wrote:
quoted
From: Tonghao Zhang <redacted>
The patch uses vhost_has_work_pending() to check if
the specified handler is scheduled, because in the most case,
vhost_has_work() return true when other side handler is added
to worker list. Use the vhost_has_work_pending() insead of
vhost_has_work().
Topology:
[Host] ->linux bridge -> tap vhost-net ->[Guest]
TCP_STREAM (netperf):
* Without the patch: 38035.39 Mbps, 3.37 us mean latency
* With the patch: 38409.44 Mbps, 3.34 us mean latency
The improvement is not obvious as last version. Do you imply there's some recent changes of vhost that make it faster?
I misunderstood the numbers, please ignore this.
It shows less than 1% improvement. I'm not sure it's worth to do so. Can you try bi-directional pktgen to see if it has more obvious effect?
Thanks
Thanks
quoted
Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <redacted>
---
drivers/vhost/net.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index db63ae2..b6939ef 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -487,10 +487,8 @@ static void vhost_net_busy_poll(struct vhost_net *net,
endtime = busy_clock() + busyloop_timeout;
while (vhost_can_busy_poll(endtime)) {
- if (vhost_has_work(&net->dev)) {
- *busyloop_intr = true;
+ if (vhost_has_work(&net->dev))
break;
- }
if ((sock_has_rx_data(sock) &&
!vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, rvq)) ||@@ -513,6 +511,11 @@ static void vhost_net_busy_poll(struct vhost_net *net,
!vhost_has_work_pending(&net->dev, VHOST_NET_VQ_RX))
vhost_net_enable_vq(net, rvq);
+ if (vhost_has_work_pending(&net->dev,
+ poll_rx ?
+ VHOST_NET_VQ_RX: VHOST_NET_VQ_TX))
+ *busyloop_intr = true;
+
mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
}
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization