Re: [PATCH] bonding: avoid repeated display of same link status change
From: rama nichanamatlu <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-20 22:19:46
gentle request. may i have review comments pls ? -Rama On 08/13/2018 01:10 PM, Rama Nichanamatlu wrote:
quoted hunk
When link status change needs to be committed and rtnl lock couldn't be taken, avoid redisplay of same link status change message. Signed-off-by: Rama Nichanamatlu <redacted> --- drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 6 ++++-- include/net/bonding.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c index 63e3844..3dd1091 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c@@ -2086,7 +2086,7 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond) bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_FAIL); commit++; slave->delay = bond->params.downdelay; - if (slave->delay) { + if (slave->delay && !bond->rtnl_needed) { netdev_info(bond->dev, "link status down for %sinterface %s, disabling it in %d ms\n", (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) ?@@ -2126,7 +2126,7 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond) commit++; slave->delay = bond->params.updelay; - if (slave->delay) { + if (slave->delay && !bond->rtnl_needed) { netdev_info(bond->dev, "link status up for interface %s, enabling it in %d ms\n", slave->dev->name, ignore_updelay ? 0 :@@ -2300,9 +2300,11 @@ static void bond_mii_monitor(struct work_struct *work) if (!rtnl_trylock()) { delay = 1; should_notify_peers = false; + bond->rtnl_needed = true; goto re_arm; } + bond->rtnl_needed = false; bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) { bond_commit_link_state(slave, BOND_SLAVE_NOTIFY_LATER); }diff --git a/include/net/bonding.h b/include/net/bonding.h index 808f1d1..50d61cf 100644 --- a/include/net/bonding.h +++ b/include/net/bonding.h@@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ struct bonding { struct dentry *debug_dir; #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */ struct rtnl_link_stats64 bond_stats; + bool rtnl_needed; }; #define bond_slave_get_rcu(dev) \