Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 00/17] ethtool netlink interface (WiP)
From: Jakub Kicinski <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-31 00:45:34
Also in:
lkml
From: Jakub Kicinski <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-31 00:45:34
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 15:07:47 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
quoted
- find reasonable format for data transfers (e.g. eeprom dump or flash); I don't have clear idea how big these can get and if 64 KB limit on attribute size (including nested ones) is a problem; if so, dumps can be an answer for dumps, some kind of multi-message requests would be needed for flashesThis is another thing that should go into devlink as it is not netdev-handled. We have now a "region" facility there which can be re-used.
+1 regions should cover the current use cases and are a better API IMHO.