Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 4 authors, 2018-07-27

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: replace unnecessarily macroses on functions

From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-27 20:23:58
Also in: linux-omap, lkml

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 01:04:22PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 22:36 +0300, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 12:21:07PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 22:13 +0300, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
quoted
Replace ugly macroses on functions.
Careful, see below.
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
[]
quoted
@@ -565,40 +565,40 @@ static const struct cpsw_stats cpsw_gstrings_ch_stats[] = {
 				(func)(slave++, ##arg);			\
 	} while (0)

-#define cpsw_dual_emac_src_port_detect(cpsw, status, ndev, skb)		\
-	do {								\
-		if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)				\
-			break;						\
-		if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 1) {		\
-			ndev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;			\
-			skb->dev = ndev;				\
-		} else if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 2) {		\
-			ndev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;			\
-			skb->dev = ndev;				\
-		}							\
-	} while (0)
-#define cpsw_add_mcast(cpsw, priv, addr)				\
-	do {								\
-		if (cpsw->data.dual_emac) {				\
-			struct cpsw_slave *slave = cpsw->slaves +	\
-						priv->emac_port;	\
-			int slave_port = cpsw_get_slave_port(		\
-						slave->slave_num);	\
-			cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr,		\
-				1 << slave_port | ALE_PORT_HOST,	\
-				ALE_VLAN, slave->port_vlan, 0);		\
-		} else {						\
-			cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr,		\
-				ALE_ALL_PORTS,				\
-				0, 0, 0);				\
-		}							\
-	} while (0)
-
 static inline int cpsw_get_slave_port(u32 slave_num)
 {
 	return slave_num + 1;
 }

+static inline void cpsw_src_port_detect(struct cpsw_common *cpsw, int status,
+					struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)
+		return;
+
+	if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 1)
+		skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;
+	else if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 2)
+		skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;
+}
perhaps better as a switch/case
not better, it's shorter.
True for the source code but it compiles to more object code.

$ cat foo.c
struct cpsw_common {
struct {
	int dual_emac;
} data;
struct {
	int ndev;
} slaves[2];
};

struct sk_buff {
int dev;
};

#define CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(__status__)        ((__status__ >> 16) & 0x7)

#if defined SWITCH

void foo(struct cpsw_common *cpsw, int status, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)
	return;

switch (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status)) {
case 1:
	skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;
	break;
case 2:
	skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;
	break;
}
}

#else

void foo(struct cpsw_common *cpsw, int status, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)
	return;

if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 1)
	skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;
else if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 2)
	skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;
}

#endif
$ gcc -c -O2 -DSWITCH foo.c
$ size foo.o
  text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
    94	      0	      0	     94	     5e	foo.o
$ objdump -d foo.o

foo.o:     file format elf64-x86-64


Disassembly of section .text:

0000000000000000 <foo>:
  0:	8b 07                	mov    (%rdi),%eax
  2:	85 c0                	test   %eax,%eax
  4:	74 15                	je     1b <foo+0x1b>
  6:	c1 fe 10             	sar    $0x10,%esi
  9:	83 e6 07             	and    $0x7,%esi
  c:	83 fe 01             	cmp    $0x1,%esi
  f:	74 17                	je     28 <foo+0x28>
 11:	83 fe 02             	cmp    $0x2,%esi
 14:	75 0a                	jne    20 <foo+0x20>
 16:	8b 47 08             	mov    0x8(%rdi),%eax
 19:	89 02                	mov    %eax,(%rdx)
 1b:	f3 c3                	repz retq
 1d:	0f 1f 00             	nopl   (%rax)
 20:	f3 c3                	repz retq
 22:	66 0f 1f 44 00 00    	nopw   0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
 28:	8b 47 04             	mov    0x4(%rdi),%eax
 2b:	89 02                	mov    %eax,(%rdx)
 2d:	c3                   	retq
$ gcc -c -O2 foo.c
$ size foo.o
  text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
   102	      0	      0	    102	     66	foo.o
$ objdump -d foo.o

foo.o:     file format elf64-x86-64


Disassembly of section .text:

0000000000000000 <foo>:
  0:	8b 07                	mov    (%rdi),%eax
  2:	85 c0                	test   %eax,%eax
  4:	74 10                	je     16 <foo+0x16>
  6:	c1 fe 10             	sar    $0x10,%esi
  9:	83 e6 07             	and    $0x7,%esi
  c:	83 fe 01             	cmp    $0x1,%esi
  f:	74 0f                	je     20 <foo+0x20>
 11:	83 fe 02             	cmp    $0x2,%esi
 14:	74 1a                	je     30 <foo+0x30>
 16:	f3 c3                	repz retq
 18:	0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 	nopl   0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
 1f:	00
 20:	8b 47 04             	mov    0x4(%rdi),%eax
 23:	89 02                	mov    %eax,(%rdx)
 25:	c3                   	retq
 26:	66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 	nopw   %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
 2d:	00 00 00
 30:	8b 47 08             	mov    0x8(%rdi),%eax
 33:	89 02                	mov    %eax,(%rdx)
 35:	c3                   	retq
This driver, mainly used for ARM

For ARM, situation a little bit different:
$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -c -O2 -DSWITCH foo.c
$ size foo.o
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
     32	      0	      0	     32	     20	foo.o

$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-objdump -d foo.o

foo.o:     file format elf32-littlearm


Disassembly of section .text:

00000000 <foo>:
   0:	6803      	ldr	r3, [r0, #0]
   2:	b143      	cbz	r3, 16 <foo+0x16>
   4:	f3c1 4102 	ubfx	r1, r1, #16, #3
   8:	2901      	cmp	r1, #1
   a:	d005      	beq.n	18 <foo+0x18>
   c:	2902      	cmp	r1, #2
   e:	d000      	beq.n	12 <foo+0x12>
  10:	4770      	bx	lr
  12:	6883      	ldr	r3, [r0, #8]
  14:	6013      	str	r3, [r2, #0]
  16:	4770      	bx	lr
  18:	6843      	ldr	r3, [r0, #4]
  1a:	6013      	str	r3, [r2, #0]
  1c:	4770      	bx	lr
  1e:	bf00      	nop



$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -c -O2 foo.c
$ size foo.o
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
     28	      0	      0	     28	     1c	foo.o

$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-objdump -d foo.o

foo.o:     file format elf32-littlearm


Disassembly of section .text:

00000000 <foo>:
   0:	6803      	ldr	r3, [r0, #0]
   2:	b13b      	cbz	r3, 14 <foo+0x14>
   4:	f3c1 4102 	ubfx	r1, r1, #16, #3
   8:	2901      	cmp	r1, #1
   a:	d004      	beq.n	16 <foo+0x16>
   c:	2902      	cmp	r1, #2
   e:	bf04      	itt	eq
  10:	6883      	ldreq	r3, [r0, #8]
  12:	6013      	streq	r3, [r2, #0]
  14:	4770      	bx	lr
  16:	6843      	ldr	r3, [r0, #4]
  18:	6013      	str	r3, [r2, #0]
  1a:	4770      	bx	lr

So, it's shorter.

-- 
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help