[PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: replace unnecessarily macroses on functions

Subsystems: networking drivers, the rest, ti ethernet switch driver (cpsw)

STALE2937d

10 messages, 4 authors, 2018-07-27 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: replace unnecessarily macroses on functions

From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-27 19:13:27

Replace ugly macroses on functions.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <redacted>
---

Based on net-next/master

 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index 1b54c26c2bec..62326a98945b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -565,40 +565,40 @@ static const struct cpsw_stats cpsw_gstrings_ch_stats[] = {
 				(func)(slave++, ##arg);			\
 	} while (0)
 
-#define cpsw_dual_emac_src_port_detect(cpsw, status, ndev, skb)		\
-	do {								\
-		if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)				\
-			break;						\
-		if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 1) {		\
-			ndev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;			\
-			skb->dev = ndev;				\
-		} else if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 2) {		\
-			ndev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;			\
-			skb->dev = ndev;				\
-		}							\
-	} while (0)
-#define cpsw_add_mcast(cpsw, priv, addr)				\
-	do {								\
-		if (cpsw->data.dual_emac) {				\
-			struct cpsw_slave *slave = cpsw->slaves +	\
-						priv->emac_port;	\
-			int slave_port = cpsw_get_slave_port(		\
-						slave->slave_num);	\
-			cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr,		\
-				1 << slave_port | ALE_PORT_HOST,	\
-				ALE_VLAN, slave->port_vlan, 0);		\
-		} else {						\
-			cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr,		\
-				ALE_ALL_PORTS,				\
-				0, 0, 0);				\
-		}							\
-	} while (0)
-
 static inline int cpsw_get_slave_port(u32 slave_num)
 {
 	return slave_num + 1;
 }
 
+static inline void cpsw_src_port_detect(struct cpsw_common *cpsw, int status,
+					struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)
+		return;
+
+	if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 1)
+		skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;
+	else if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 2)
+		skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;
+}
+
+static void cpsw_add_mcast(struct cpsw_priv *priv, u8 *addr)
+{
+	struct cpsw_common *cpsw = priv->cpsw;
+
+	if (cpsw->data.dual_emac) {
+		struct cpsw_slave *slave = cpsw->slaves + priv->emac_port;
+		int slave_port = cpsw_get_slave_port(slave->slave_num);
+
+		cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr,
+				   1 << slave_port | ALE_PORT_HOST,
+				   ALE_VLAN, slave->port_vlan, 0);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr, ALE_ALL_PORTS, 0, 0, 0);
+}
+
 static void cpsw_set_promiscious(struct net_device *ndev, bool enable)
 {
 	struct cpsw_common *cpsw = ndev_to_cpsw(ndev);
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static void cpsw_ndo_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *ndev)
 
 		/* program multicast address list into ALE register */
 		netdev_for_each_mc_addr(ha, ndev) {
-			cpsw_add_mcast(cpsw, priv, (u8 *)ha->addr);
+			cpsw_add_mcast(priv, (u8 *)ha->addr);
 		}
 	}
 }
@@ -801,7 +801,8 @@ static void cpsw_rx_handler(void *token, int len, int status)
 	int			ret = 0;
 	struct cpsw_common	*cpsw = ndev_to_cpsw(ndev);
 
-	cpsw_dual_emac_src_port_detect(cpsw, status, ndev, skb);
+	cpsw_src_port_detect(cpsw, status, skb);
+	ndev = skb->dev;
 
 	if (unlikely(status < 0) || unlikely(!netif_running(ndev))) {
 		/* In dual emac mode check for all interfaces */
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: replace unnecessarily macroses on functions

From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Date: 2018-07-27 19:16:00


On 07/27/2018 02:13 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
Replace ugly macroses on functions.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>


-- 
regards,
-grygorii

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: replace unnecessarily macroses on functions

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: 2018-07-27 19:21:15

On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 22:13 +0300, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
Replace ugly macroses on functions.
Careful, see below.
quoted hunk
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
[]
quoted hunk
@@ -565,40 +565,40 @@ static const struct cpsw_stats cpsw_gstrings_ch_stats[] = {
 				(func)(slave++, ##arg);			\
 	} while (0)
 
-#define cpsw_dual_emac_src_port_detect(cpsw, status, ndev, skb)		\
-	do {								\
-		if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)				\
-			break;						\
-		if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 1) {		\
-			ndev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;			\
-			skb->dev = ndev;				\
-		} else if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 2) {		\
-			ndev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;			\
-			skb->dev = ndev;				\
-		}							\
-	} while (0)
-#define cpsw_add_mcast(cpsw, priv, addr)				\
-	do {								\
-		if (cpsw->data.dual_emac) {				\
-			struct cpsw_slave *slave = cpsw->slaves +	\
-						priv->emac_port;	\
-			int slave_port = cpsw_get_slave_port(		\
-						slave->slave_num);	\
-			cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr,		\
-				1 << slave_port | ALE_PORT_HOST,	\
-				ALE_VLAN, slave->port_vlan, 0);		\
-		} else {						\
-			cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr,		\
-				ALE_ALL_PORTS,				\
-				0, 0, 0);				\
-		}							\
-	} while (0)
-
 static inline int cpsw_get_slave_port(u32 slave_num)
 {
 	return slave_num + 1;
 }
 
+static inline void cpsw_src_port_detect(struct cpsw_common *cpsw, int status,
+					struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)
+		return;
+
+	if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 1)
+		skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;
+	else if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 2)
+		skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;
+}
perhaps better as a switch/case
quoted hunk
+
+static void cpsw_add_mcast(struct cpsw_priv *priv, u8 *addr)
+{
+	struct cpsw_common *cpsw = priv->cpsw;
+
+	if (cpsw->data.dual_emac) {
+		struct cpsw_slave *slave = cpsw->slaves + priv->emac_port;
+		int slave_port = cpsw_get_slave_port(slave->slave_num);
+
+		cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr,
+				   1 << slave_port | ALE_PORT_HOST,
+				   ALE_VLAN, slave->port_vlan, 0);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr, ALE_ALL_PORTS, 0, 0, 0);
+}
+
 static void cpsw_set_promiscious(struct net_device *ndev, bool enable)
 {
 	struct cpsw_common *cpsw = ndev_to_cpsw(ndev);
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static void cpsw_ndo_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *ndev)
 
 		/* program multicast address list into ALE register */
 		netdev_for_each_mc_addr(ha, ndev) {
-			cpsw_add_mcast(cpsw, priv, (u8 *)ha->addr);
+			cpsw_add_mcast(priv, (u8 *)ha->addr);
 		}
 	}
 }
@@ -801,7 +801,8 @@ static void cpsw_rx_handler(void *token, int len, int status)
 	int			ret = 0;
 	struct cpsw_common	*cpsw = ndev_to_cpsw(ndev);
 
-	cpsw_dual_emac_src_port_detect(cpsw, status, ndev, skb);
+	cpsw_src_port_detect(cpsw, status, skb);
+	ndev = skb->dev;
This is not the same code as the new function
is not guaranteed to succeed or set skb->dev.
 	if (unlikely(status < 0) || unlikely(!netif_running(ndev))) {
 		/* In dual emac mode check for all interfaces */

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: replace unnecessarily macroses on functions

From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-27 19:36:50

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 12:21:07PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 22:13 +0300, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
quoted
Replace ugly macroses on functions.
Careful, see below.
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
[]
quoted
@@ -565,40 +565,40 @@ static const struct cpsw_stats cpsw_gstrings_ch_stats[] = {
 				(func)(slave++, ##arg);			\
 	} while (0)

-#define cpsw_dual_emac_src_port_detect(cpsw, status, ndev, skb)		\
-	do {								\
-		if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)				\
-			break;						\
-		if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 1) {		\
-			ndev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;			\
-			skb->dev = ndev;				\
-		} else if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 2) {		\
-			ndev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;			\
-			skb->dev = ndev;				\
-		}							\
-	} while (0)
-#define cpsw_add_mcast(cpsw, priv, addr)				\
-	do {								\
-		if (cpsw->data.dual_emac) {				\
-			struct cpsw_slave *slave = cpsw->slaves +	\
-						priv->emac_port;	\
-			int slave_port = cpsw_get_slave_port(		\
-						slave->slave_num);	\
-			cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr,		\
-				1 << slave_port | ALE_PORT_HOST,	\
-				ALE_VLAN, slave->port_vlan, 0);		\
-		} else {						\
-			cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr,		\
-				ALE_ALL_PORTS,				\
-				0, 0, 0);				\
-		}							\
-	} while (0)
-
 static inline int cpsw_get_slave_port(u32 slave_num)
 {
 	return slave_num + 1;
 }

+static inline void cpsw_src_port_detect(struct cpsw_common *cpsw, int status,
+					struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)
+		return;
+
+	if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 1)
+		skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;
+	else if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 2)
+		skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;
+}
perhaps better as a switch/case
not better, it's shorter.
quoted
+
+static void cpsw_add_mcast(struct cpsw_priv *priv, u8 *addr)
+{
+	struct cpsw_common *cpsw = priv->cpsw;
+
+	if (cpsw->data.dual_emac) {
+		struct cpsw_slave *slave = cpsw->slaves + priv->emac_port;
+		int slave_port = cpsw_get_slave_port(slave->slave_num);
+
+		cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr,
+				   1 << slave_port | ALE_PORT_HOST,
+				   ALE_VLAN, slave->port_vlan, 0);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr, ALE_ALL_PORTS, 0, 0, 0);
+}
+
 static void cpsw_set_promiscious(struct net_device *ndev, bool enable)
 {
 	struct cpsw_common *cpsw = ndev_to_cpsw(ndev);
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static void cpsw_ndo_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *ndev)

 		/* program multicast address list into ALE register */
 		netdev_for_each_mc_addr(ha, ndev) {
-			cpsw_add_mcast(cpsw, priv, (u8 *)ha->addr);
+			cpsw_add_mcast(priv, (u8 *)ha->addr);
 		}
 	}
 }
@@ -801,7 +801,8 @@ static void cpsw_rx_handler(void *token, int len, int status)
 	int			ret = 0;
 	struct cpsw_common	*cpsw = ndev_to_cpsw(ndev);

-	cpsw_dual_emac_src_port_detect(cpsw, status, ndev, skb);
+	cpsw_src_port_detect(cpsw, status, skb);
+	ndev = skb->dev;
This is not the same code as the new function
is not guaranteed to succeed or set skb->dev.
Guaranteed by above skb->dev is initialized already.
The function reflects previous macro.

Even more, seems that here is duplication of ndev=skb->dev;
It should be removed at init ), even if it 100% is optimized by complier.
So guaranteed a little more then needed ), will send v2 with removed
ndev = skb->dev at init if no objection.
quoted
 	if (unlikely(status < 0) || unlikely(!netif_running(ndev))) {
 		/* In dual emac mode check for all interfaces */
-- 
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: replace unnecessarily macroses on functions

From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-27 19:53:03

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:36:43PM +0300, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 12:21:07PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 22:13 +0300, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
quoted
Replace ugly macroses on functions.
Careful, see below.
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
[]
quoted
@@ -565,40 +565,40 @@ static const struct cpsw_stats cpsw_gstrings_ch_stats[] = {
				(func)(slave++, ##arg);			\
	} while (0)

-#define cpsw_dual_emac_src_port_detect(cpsw, status, ndev, skb)		\
-	do {								\
-		if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)				\
-			break;						\
-		if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 1) {		\
-			ndev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;			\
-			skb->dev = ndev;				\
-		} else if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 2) {		\
-			ndev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;			\
-			skb->dev = ndev;				\
-		}							\
-	} while (0)
-#define cpsw_add_mcast(cpsw, priv, addr)				\
-	do {								\
-		if (cpsw->data.dual_emac) {				\
-			struct cpsw_slave *slave = cpsw->slaves +	\
-						priv->emac_port;	\
-			int slave_port = cpsw_get_slave_port(		\
-						slave->slave_num);	\
-			cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr,		\
-				1 << slave_port | ALE_PORT_HOST,	\
-				ALE_VLAN, slave->port_vlan, 0);		\
-		} else {						\
-			cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr,		\
-				ALE_ALL_PORTS,				\
-				0, 0, 0);				\
-		}							\
-	} while (0)
-
static inline int cpsw_get_slave_port(u32 slave_num)
{
	return slave_num + 1;
}

+static inline void cpsw_src_port_detect(struct cpsw_common *cpsw, int status,
+					struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)
+		return;
+
+	if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 1)
+		skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;
+	else if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 2)
+		skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;
+}
perhaps better as a switch/case
not better, it's shorter.
quoted
quoted
+
+static void cpsw_add_mcast(struct cpsw_priv *priv, u8 *addr)
+{
+	struct cpsw_common *cpsw = priv->cpsw;
+
+	if (cpsw->data.dual_emac) {
+		struct cpsw_slave *slave = cpsw->slaves + priv->emac_port;
+		int slave_port = cpsw_get_slave_port(slave->slave_num);
+
+		cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr,
+				   1 << slave_port | ALE_PORT_HOST,
+				   ALE_VLAN, slave->port_vlan, 0);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr, ALE_ALL_PORTS, 0, 0, 0);
+}
+
static void cpsw_set_promiscious(struct net_device *ndev, bool enable)
{
	struct cpsw_common *cpsw = ndev_to_cpsw(ndev);
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static void cpsw_ndo_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *ndev)
		/* program multicast address list into ALE register */
		netdev_for_each_mc_addr(ha, ndev) {
-			cpsw_add_mcast(cpsw, priv, (u8 *)ha->addr);
+			cpsw_add_mcast(priv, (u8 *)ha->addr);
		}
	}
}
@@ -801,7 +801,8 @@ static void cpsw_rx_handler(void *token, int len, int status)
	int			ret = 0;
	struct cpsw_common	*cpsw = ndev_to_cpsw(ndev);

-	cpsw_dual_emac_src_port_detect(cpsw, status, ndev, skb);
+	cpsw_src_port_detect(cpsw, status, skb);
+	ndev = skb->dev;
This is not the same code as the new function
is not guaranteed to succeed or set skb->dev.
Guaranteed by above skb->dev is initialized already.
The function reflects previous macro.

Even more, seems that here is duplication of ndev=skb->dev;
It should be removed at init ), even if it 100% is optimized by complier.
So guaranteed a little more then needed ), will send v2 with removed
ndev = skb->dev at init if no objection.
But no, not duplicates.
It's used to get cpsw. So everyting is fine.
Patch should go as is.
quoted
quoted
	if (unlikely(status < 0) || unlikely(!netif_running(ndev))) {
		/* In dual emac mode check for all interfaces */
-- 
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk
-- 
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: replace unnecessarily macroses on functions

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: 2018-07-27 20:04:28

On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 22:36 +0300, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 12:21:07PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 22:13 +0300, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
quoted
Replace ugly macroses on functions.
Careful, see below.
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
[]
quoted
@@ -565,40 +565,40 @@ static const struct cpsw_stats cpsw_gstrings_ch_stats[] = {
 				(func)(slave++, ##arg);			\
 	} while (0)

-#define cpsw_dual_emac_src_port_detect(cpsw, status, ndev, skb)		\
-	do {								\
-		if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)				\
-			break;						\
-		if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 1) {		\
-			ndev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;			\
-			skb->dev = ndev;				\
-		} else if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 2) {		\
-			ndev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;			\
-			skb->dev = ndev;				\
-		}							\
-	} while (0)
-#define cpsw_add_mcast(cpsw, priv, addr)				\
-	do {								\
-		if (cpsw->data.dual_emac) {				\
-			struct cpsw_slave *slave = cpsw->slaves +	\
-						priv->emac_port;	\
-			int slave_port = cpsw_get_slave_port(		\
-						slave->slave_num);	\
-			cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr,		\
-				1 << slave_port | ALE_PORT_HOST,	\
-				ALE_VLAN, slave->port_vlan, 0);		\
-		} else {						\
-			cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr,		\
-				ALE_ALL_PORTS,				\
-				0, 0, 0);				\
-		}							\
-	} while (0)
-
 static inline int cpsw_get_slave_port(u32 slave_num)
 {
 	return slave_num + 1;
 }

+static inline void cpsw_src_port_detect(struct cpsw_common *cpsw, int status,
+					struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)
+		return;
+
+	if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 1)
+		skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;
+	else if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 2)
+		skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;
+}
perhaps better as a switch/case
not better, it's shorter.
True for the source code but it compiles to more object code.

$ cat foo.c
struct cpsw_common {
	struct {
		int dual_emac;
	} data;
	struct {
		int ndev;
	} slaves[2];
};

struct sk_buff {
	int dev;
};

#define CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(__status__)        ((__status__ >> 16) & 0x7)

#if defined SWITCH

void foo(struct cpsw_common *cpsw, int status, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
	if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)
		return;

	switch (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status)) {
	case 1:
		skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;
		break;
	case 2:
		skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;
		break;
	}
}

#else

void foo(struct cpsw_common *cpsw, int status, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
	if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)
		return;

	if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 1)
		skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;
	else if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 2)
		skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;
}

#endif
$ gcc -c -O2 -DSWITCH foo.c
$ size foo.o
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
     94	      0	      0	     94	     5e	foo.o
$ objdump -d foo.o

foo.o:     file format elf64-x86-64


Disassembly of section .text:

0000000000000000 <foo>:
   0:	8b 07                	mov    (%rdi),%eax
   2:	85 c0                	test   %eax,%eax
   4:	74 15                	je     1b <foo+0x1b>
   6:	c1 fe 10             	sar    $0x10,%esi
   9:	83 e6 07             	and    $0x7,%esi
   c:	83 fe 01             	cmp    $0x1,%esi
   f:	74 17                	je     28 <foo+0x28>
  11:	83 fe 02             	cmp    $0x2,%esi
  14:	75 0a                	jne    20 <foo+0x20>
  16:	8b 47 08             	mov    0x8(%rdi),%eax
  19:	89 02                	mov    %eax,(%rdx)
  1b:	f3 c3                	repz retq 
  1d:	0f 1f 00             	nopl   (%rax)
  20:	f3 c3                	repz retq 
  22:	66 0f 1f 44 00 00    	nopw   0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
  28:	8b 47 04             	mov    0x4(%rdi),%eax
  2b:	89 02                	mov    %eax,(%rdx)
  2d:	c3                   	retq   
$ gcc -c -O2 foo.c
$ size foo.o
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
    102	      0	      0	    102	     66	foo.o
$ objdump -d foo.o

foo.o:     file format elf64-x86-64


Disassembly of section .text:

0000000000000000 <foo>:
   0:	8b 07                	mov    (%rdi),%eax
   2:	85 c0                	test   %eax,%eax
   4:	74 10                	je     16 <foo+0x16>
   6:	c1 fe 10             	sar    $0x10,%esi
   9:	83 e6 07             	and    $0x7,%esi
   c:	83 fe 01             	cmp    $0x1,%esi
   f:	74 0f                	je     20 <foo+0x20>
  11:	83 fe 02             	cmp    $0x2,%esi
  14:	74 1a                	je     30 <foo+0x30>
  16:	f3 c3                	repz retq 
  18:	0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 	nopl   0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
  1f:	00 
  20:	8b 47 04             	mov    0x4(%rdi),%eax
  23:	89 02                	mov    %eax,(%rdx)
  25:	c3                   	retq   
  26:	66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 	nopw   %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
  2d:	00 00 00 
  30:	8b 47 08             	mov    0x8(%rdi),%eax
  33:	89 02                	mov    %eax,(%rdx)
  35:	c3                   	retq   

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: replace unnecessarily macroses on functions

From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-27 20:23:58

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 01:04:22PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 22:36 +0300, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 12:21:07PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 22:13 +0300, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
quoted
Replace ugly macroses on functions.
Careful, see below.
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
[]
quoted
@@ -565,40 +565,40 @@ static const struct cpsw_stats cpsw_gstrings_ch_stats[] = {
 				(func)(slave++, ##arg);			\
 	} while (0)

-#define cpsw_dual_emac_src_port_detect(cpsw, status, ndev, skb)		\
-	do {								\
-		if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)				\
-			break;						\
-		if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 1) {		\
-			ndev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;			\
-			skb->dev = ndev;				\
-		} else if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 2) {		\
-			ndev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;			\
-			skb->dev = ndev;				\
-		}							\
-	} while (0)
-#define cpsw_add_mcast(cpsw, priv, addr)				\
-	do {								\
-		if (cpsw->data.dual_emac) {				\
-			struct cpsw_slave *slave = cpsw->slaves +	\
-						priv->emac_port;	\
-			int slave_port = cpsw_get_slave_port(		\
-						slave->slave_num);	\
-			cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr,		\
-				1 << slave_port | ALE_PORT_HOST,	\
-				ALE_VLAN, slave->port_vlan, 0);		\
-		} else {						\
-			cpsw_ale_add_mcast(cpsw->ale, addr,		\
-				ALE_ALL_PORTS,				\
-				0, 0, 0);				\
-		}							\
-	} while (0)
-
 static inline int cpsw_get_slave_port(u32 slave_num)
 {
 	return slave_num + 1;
 }

+static inline void cpsw_src_port_detect(struct cpsw_common *cpsw, int status,
+					struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)
+		return;
+
+	if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 1)
+		skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;
+	else if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 2)
+		skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;
+}
perhaps better as a switch/case
not better, it's shorter.
True for the source code but it compiles to more object code.

$ cat foo.c
struct cpsw_common {
struct {
	int dual_emac;
} data;
struct {
	int ndev;
} slaves[2];
};

struct sk_buff {
int dev;
};

#define CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(__status__)        ((__status__ >> 16) & 0x7)

#if defined SWITCH

void foo(struct cpsw_common *cpsw, int status, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)
	return;

switch (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status)) {
case 1:
	skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;
	break;
case 2:
	skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;
	break;
}
}

#else

void foo(struct cpsw_common *cpsw, int status, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac)
	return;

if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 1)
	skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[0].ndev;
else if (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status) == 2)
	skb->dev = cpsw->slaves[1].ndev;
}

#endif
$ gcc -c -O2 -DSWITCH foo.c
$ size foo.o
  text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
    94	      0	      0	     94	     5e	foo.o
$ objdump -d foo.o

foo.o:     file format elf64-x86-64


Disassembly of section .text:

0000000000000000 <foo>:
  0:	8b 07                	mov    (%rdi),%eax
  2:	85 c0                	test   %eax,%eax
  4:	74 15                	je     1b <foo+0x1b>
  6:	c1 fe 10             	sar    $0x10,%esi
  9:	83 e6 07             	and    $0x7,%esi
  c:	83 fe 01             	cmp    $0x1,%esi
  f:	74 17                	je     28 <foo+0x28>
 11:	83 fe 02             	cmp    $0x2,%esi
 14:	75 0a                	jne    20 <foo+0x20>
 16:	8b 47 08             	mov    0x8(%rdi),%eax
 19:	89 02                	mov    %eax,(%rdx)
 1b:	f3 c3                	repz retq
 1d:	0f 1f 00             	nopl   (%rax)
 20:	f3 c3                	repz retq
 22:	66 0f 1f 44 00 00    	nopw   0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
 28:	8b 47 04             	mov    0x4(%rdi),%eax
 2b:	89 02                	mov    %eax,(%rdx)
 2d:	c3                   	retq
$ gcc -c -O2 foo.c
$ size foo.o
  text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
   102	      0	      0	    102	     66	foo.o
$ objdump -d foo.o

foo.o:     file format elf64-x86-64


Disassembly of section .text:

0000000000000000 <foo>:
  0:	8b 07                	mov    (%rdi),%eax
  2:	85 c0                	test   %eax,%eax
  4:	74 10                	je     16 <foo+0x16>
  6:	c1 fe 10             	sar    $0x10,%esi
  9:	83 e6 07             	and    $0x7,%esi
  c:	83 fe 01             	cmp    $0x1,%esi
  f:	74 0f                	je     20 <foo+0x20>
 11:	83 fe 02             	cmp    $0x2,%esi
 14:	74 1a                	je     30 <foo+0x30>
 16:	f3 c3                	repz retq
 18:	0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 	nopl   0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
 1f:	00
 20:	8b 47 04             	mov    0x4(%rdi),%eax
 23:	89 02                	mov    %eax,(%rdx)
 25:	c3                   	retq
 26:	66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 	nopw   %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
 2d:	00 00 00
 30:	8b 47 08             	mov    0x8(%rdi),%eax
 33:	89 02                	mov    %eax,(%rdx)
 35:	c3                   	retq
This driver, mainly used for ARM

For ARM, situation a little bit different:
$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -c -O2 -DSWITCH foo.c
$ size foo.o
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
     32	      0	      0	     32	     20	foo.o

$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-objdump -d foo.o

foo.o:     file format elf32-littlearm


Disassembly of section .text:

00000000 <foo>:
   0:	6803      	ldr	r3, [r0, #0]
   2:	b143      	cbz	r3, 16 <foo+0x16>
   4:	f3c1 4102 	ubfx	r1, r1, #16, #3
   8:	2901      	cmp	r1, #1
   a:	d005      	beq.n	18 <foo+0x18>
   c:	2902      	cmp	r1, #2
   e:	d000      	beq.n	12 <foo+0x12>
  10:	4770      	bx	lr
  12:	6883      	ldr	r3, [r0, #8]
  14:	6013      	str	r3, [r2, #0]
  16:	4770      	bx	lr
  18:	6843      	ldr	r3, [r0, #4]
  1a:	6013      	str	r3, [r2, #0]
  1c:	4770      	bx	lr
  1e:	bf00      	nop



$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -c -O2 foo.c
$ size foo.o
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
     28	      0	      0	     28	     1c	foo.o

$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-objdump -d foo.o

foo.o:     file format elf32-littlearm


Disassembly of section .text:

00000000 <foo>:
   0:	6803      	ldr	r3, [r0, #0]
   2:	b13b      	cbz	r3, 14 <foo+0x14>
   4:	f3c1 4102 	ubfx	r1, r1, #16, #3
   8:	2901      	cmp	r1, #1
   a:	d004      	beq.n	16 <foo+0x16>
   c:	2902      	cmp	r1, #2
   e:	bf04      	itt	eq
  10:	6883      	ldreq	r3, [r0, #8]
  12:	6013      	streq	r3, [r2, #0]
  14:	4770      	bx	lr
  16:	6843      	ldr	r3, [r0, #4]
  18:	6013      	str	r3, [r2, #0]
  1a:	4770      	bx	lr

So, it's shorter.

-- 
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: replace unnecessarily macroses on functions

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: 2018-07-27 20:29:58

On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 23:23 +0300, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
For ARM, situation a little bit different:
$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -c -O2 -DSWITCH foo.c
$ size foo.o
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
     32	      0	      0	     32	     20	foo.o
[]
$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -c -O2 foo.c
$ size foo.o
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
     28	      0	      0	     28	     1c	foo.o
[]
So, it's shorter.
No worries.

I was kinda surprised the object code wasn't identical anyway.

cheers, Joe

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: replace unnecessarily macroses on functions

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2018-07-27 20:32:12

+static inline void cpsw_src_port_detect(struct cpsw_common *cpsw, int status,
+					struct sk_buff *skb)
Please don't use inline. Let the compiler decide.

       Andrew

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: replace unnecessarily macroses on functions

From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-27 20:49:59

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:32:03PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
quoted
+static inline void cpsw_src_port_detect(struct cpsw_common *cpsw, int status,
+					struct sk_buff *skb)
Please don't use inline. Let the compiler decide.

      Andrew
Corrected in v2

-- 
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help