On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 01:15:36PM +0200, Máté Eckl wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 12:56:05PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
[...]
This patch only solves the nf_socket and nft_socket modules problem so I can
only submit a v2 for 'netfilter: Kconfig: Change IPv6 select dependencies' but
you already applied it so it would meen a force push. Should I do this?
I think Arnd's patch solves these problems in case we don't want to force-push
or rebase.
You are refering to these two patches, right?
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/941374/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/941696/
quoted
I think it's better if we toss your original patch in the tree and
rebase, ie. take the new one that fixes all issues that Arnd is
reporting. It would be good if we can sort out this before I send the
next pull request for net-next stuff.
I was afraid of fallout like this when I saw your original patch,
kbuild is always tricky.
This patch is not related to the nft_tproxy module (it seems that you refer to
that) as Arnd didn't have that in the tree when doing this. I'll send a v4 fot
the tproxy module, but that cannot be related to this one as it is not in tree
yet.
No, I'm refering to 35bf1ccecaaa ("netfilter: Kconfig: Change IPv6
select dependencies"), that is causing the issues.
Thanks.